[Lsr] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-20: (with COMMENT)

2018-12-04 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-20: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph

Re: [Lsr] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-20: (with COMMENT)

2018-12-05 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
ing". > On 12/4/18, 1:40 PM, "Spencer Dawkins" > wrote: > > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-20: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line i

Re: [Lsr] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-20: (with COMMENT)

2018-12-05 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
18, at 11:34 AM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF < > spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, Acee, > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:37 PM Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > > Hi Spencer, > > I'm replying as document shepherd. > > > > It's

Re: [Lsr] [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03

2018-12-05 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Les, On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 6:52 PM Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: > Yoshi - > > Thanx for taking the time to review. > > I can appreciate that this may the first time you have looked at RFC7810 - > let alone the bis draft. As a result you have commented on content which is > common to the

Re: [Lsr] [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-03

2018-12-05 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
ue. > > > > “mitigation the risk” should be “mitigation of the risk” > > > > I will address that. > > > >Les > > > > > > *From:* Spencer Dawkins at IETF > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 05, 2018 6:41 PM > *To:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) >