We have published a new draft
discusses the IGP extensions for SR service segments in SFC.
Comments, suggestions and questions are more than welcome.
Thanks for reading the draft.
Yes, the main purpose of this draft is to carry the segment segment information
via IGP so only one node per AS need to be connected with the controller
With the existing BGP-LS extension draft, it is certainly one solution to
Thanks for the correction. My previous description is not accurate.
What I try to say is that, the operator can run either IGP or BGP on the SF
nodes based on the network deployment consideration.
If a network is deployed as shown in the figure below, we can choose to use IGP