Yes, I support the adoption.
Best regards,
Jie
发件人: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Acee Lindem (acee)
发送时间: 2019年2月13日 21:26
收件人: lsr@ietf.org
主题: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix
Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01
This begins a two
out.
Thanks,
Acee
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)"
Date: Monday, February 18, 2019 at 11:43 PM
To: Aijun Wang , Acee Lindem ,
"lsr@ietf.org"
Subject: RE: [Lsr] 答复: Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for
Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-os
ebruary 18, 2019 at 11:43 PM
To: Aijun Wang , Acee Lindem ,
"lsr@ietf.org"
Subject: RE: [Lsr] 答复: Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for
Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01
Aijun –
The fact that you have acknowledged the limitations p
Aijun,
On 19/02/2019 03:01 , Aijun Wang wrote:
Hi, Peter and Dirk:
Thanks for your comments and the previous explanation.
For the use case related to the topology retrieval, I have the following
consideration, please point out if I have some misunderstandings for the
OSPF LSA procedure:
1)
: Lsr On Behalf Of Aijun Wang
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 6:40 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Acee Lindem (acee)
; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] 答复: Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix
Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01
Hi, Les:
Thank
Hi, Les:
Thanks for your comments.
After the previous discussion within WG list, I had changed the description
about the inter-area topology retrieval scenario, which is the original source
of this draft that is different from RFC7794.
We point out such use case can be applied where each
Hi, Peter and Dirk:
Thanks for your comments and the previous explanation.
For the use case related to the topology retrieval, I have the following
consideration, please point out if I have some misunderstandings for the
OSPF LSA procedure:
1) For prefix that is rooted at only one router, such
