> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Peter Psenak
> > ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
> >
> > Subject: RE: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing
> > based Virtual Transport Network
> >
> > Hi Les,
> >
> > Thanks for your review and comm
Routing based
Virtual Transport Network
Jie -
Inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dongjie (Jimmy)
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 3:04 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Peter Psenak
> ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
>
> Subject: RE: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT
Jie -
Inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dongjie (Jimmy)
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 3:04 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Peter Psenak
> ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
>
> Subject: RE: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based
> V
5120, nor RFC 5305.
>
> Best regards,
> Jie
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2020 1:12 AM
> To: Peter Psenak ; Dongjie (Jimmy)
> ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
> Subject: RE: [Lsr
: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based
Virtual Transport Network
On 27/03/2020 16:32, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote:
Hi Peter,
My question actually is: where does the TLV 222 column in the IANA registry
come from? As it is not specified in the IANA section of RFC 5120
ch 29, 2020 9:57 PM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Peter Psenak
> ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
>
> Subject: RE: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based
> Virtual Transport Network
>
> Hi Les,
>
> Many thanks for providing the history about
, March 28, 2020 1:12 AM
To: Peter Psenak ; Dongjie (Jimmy)
; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
Subject: RE: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based
Virtual Transport Network
Jie -
The registry clearly indicates the set of specifications - and does so on a per
sub-TLV basis
t;>> From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Psenak
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 10:09 PM
>>>>>> To: xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment
y" for all TE attributes. What else do you need?
> >
> >>
> >> And please see further replies inline with [Jie]:
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 7:03 PM
the L2 bundle discussion.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 4:11 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based
Virtual Transport Network
Hi
> *From:* Joel M. Halpern <mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com>
> *Date:* 2020-03-25 21:52
> *To:* xie...@chinatelecom.cn <mailto:xie...@chinatelecom.cn>; lsr
> <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-To
27, 2020 4:11 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based
Virtual Transport Network
Hi Dongjie,
On 27/03/2020 07:56, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> You missed some of my comments in prev
Irrespectively,
John
Juniper Business Use Only
From: Aijun Wang
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 9:37 PM
To: John E Drake
Cc: Joel M. Halpern ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based
Virtual Transport Network
[External Email
the requirements of services.
Best regards
Chongfeng
中国电信股份有限公司研究院
+86-10-50902116
From: Joel M. Halpern
Date: 2020-03-26 21:35
To: xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based
Virtual Transport Network
In once sense, the statement
al Message-
From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 7:03 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based
Virtual Transport Network
Hi Dongjie,
On 26/03/2020 11:57, Dong
gards,
Jie
-Original Message-
From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 12:05 AM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Peter Psenak
; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
Subject: RE: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based
Virtual Transport Netwo
ak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 7:03 PM
To: Dongjie (Jimmy) ; xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based
Virtual Transport Network
Hi Dongjie,
On 26/03/2020 11:57, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
>
gt;
> John
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Lsr On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 9:36 AM
>> To: xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
>> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment
t; To: Peter Psenak ;
> xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based
> Virtual Transport Network
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> As described in the abstract, the purpose of this draft is to define a
> simplified
> co
Thursday, March 26, 2020 9:36 AM
> To: xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based
> Virtual Transport Network
>
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>
>
> In once sense, the statement is inherentl
this helps.
Chongfeng
*From:* Joel M. Halpern <mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com>
*Date:* 2020-03-25 21:52
*To:* xie...@chinatelecom.cn <mailto:xie...@chinatelecom.cn>; lsr
<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
*Subject:* Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment
Rou
PM
To: xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment
Routing based Virtual Transport Network
Hi Chongfeng,
what exactly is being standardized in this draft? I don't see anything.
thanks,
Peter
On 25/03/2020 14:44, xie...@chinatelecom.cn wrote:
Hello,
r
option. We are open to discussion about this.
Best regards,
Jie
>
> thanks,
> Peter
>
>
> >
> > Thus we think it is appropriate to be standard track.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Jie
> >
> >> -Original Message-----
> >> From: L
] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based
Virtual Transport Network
Hi Chongfeng,
what exactly is being standardized in this draft? I don't see anything.
thanks,
Peter
On 25/03/2020 14:44, xie...@chinatelecom.cn wrote:
Hello, folks,
we have submitted a new draft of
https
, 2020 10:09 PM
> To: xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based
> Virtual Transport Network
>
> Hi Chongfeng,
>
> what exactly is being standardized in this draft? I don't see anything.
>
> thanks,
>
this helps.
Chongfeng
From: Joel M. Halpern
Date: 2020-03-25 21:52
To: xie...@chinatelecom.cn; lsr
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based
Virtual Transport Network
This drafts starts by asserting that there are limitations on what can
be done with the existing
Hi Chongfeng,
what exactly is being standardized in this draft? I don't see anything.
thanks,
Peter
On 25/03/2020 14:44, xie...@chinatelecom.cn wrote:
Hello, folks,
we have submitted a new draft of
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-00 .
It is about Using IS-IS
This drafts starts by asserting that there are limitations on what can
be done with the existing technology. As the description is quite
vague, I can not be certain. But I do not know of any difficulty in
providing the described capabilities with current technology, without
introducing a
Hello, folks,
we have submitted a new draft of
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-00 .
It is about Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual
Transport Network. Enhanced VPN (VPN+) as defined in I-D.ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn
aims to provide enhanced
29 matches
Mail list logo
