Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-07-08 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Thanks Amanda.

-Original Message-
From: Lsr  On Behalf Of Amanda Baber via RT
Sent: 09 July 2020 01:37
To: Acee Lindem (acee) 
Cc: alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; 
gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com; mraj...@juniper.net; 
acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; aretana.i...@gmail.com; Peter 
Psenak (ppsenak) 
Subject: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for 
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

Hi Peter, Ketan, Acee, 

We've added a permanent entry for B-bit in the LLS Type 1 Extended Options and 
Flags registry and moved the Flooding Request bit registration to 0x0020:

0x0010  B-bit   [draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01]
0x0020  Flooding Request bit[draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding]

Please see
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs

Best regards,

Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist

On Wed Jul 08 08:53:07 2020, ppse...@cisco.com wrote:
> Amanda,
> 
> On 07/07/2020 22:54, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
> > Peter, should we go ahead?
> 
> yes, please.
> 
> thanks,
> Peter
> 
> > 
> > thanks,
> > Amanda
> > 
> > On Tue Jul 07 20:14:48 2020, a...@cisco.com wrote:
> >> Gunter is on vacation...
> >> Thanks,
> >> Acee
> >>
> >> On 7/6/20, 1:14 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" 
> >> 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Ketan, Peter,
> >>
> >> I believe we're waiting for Gunter to approve as the remaining 
> >> expert, but we can move ahead if Peter confirms that we don't need to wait.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Amanda
> >>
> >> On Mon Jul 06 03:46:02 2020, ket...@cisco.com wrote:
> >>> Hi Amanda/All,
> >>>
> >>> I thought that there was an agreement to assign bit 0x0010 for 
> >>> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x0020 for draft-ietf-
> >>> lsr-
> >>> dynamic-flooding?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Ketan
> >>>
> >>> -Original Message-----
> >>>   From: Amanda Baber via RT 
> >>> Sent: 04 July 2020 07:53
> >>> To: Acee Lindem (acee) 
> >>> Cc: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) ; 
> >>> mraj...@juniper.net; lsr@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) 
> >>> ; gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com; 
> >>> aretana.i...@gmail.com; alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com; 
> >>> acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org
> >>> Subject: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for 
> >>> draft- ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode
> >>>
> >>> Hi Peter, all,
> >>>
> >>>>> For both Peter and Gunter: the Flooding Request bit registration 
> >>>>> is described in the registry as a temporary allocation, but this 
> >>>>> may have been an mistake The RFC 7120 temporary early allocation 
> >>>>> procedure is meant for registries that require RFC publication 
> >>>>> for permanent registration. In theory, if the experts agree, 
> >>>>> permanent registrations can be made in Expert Review registries 
> >>>>> at any time.
> >>>>> Would there be an issue with removing the "TEMPORARY" 
> >>>>> designation from that registration?
> >>>>
> >>>> please go ahead and remove the TEMPORARY.
> >>>
> >>> The "TEMPORARY" designation has been removed from the 
> >>> draft-ietf-lsr- dynamic-flooding registration in LLS Type 1 
> >>> Extended Options and Flags, currently still assigned 0x0010:
> >>>
> >>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>> Amanda
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 

___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr


Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-07-08 Thread Peter Psenak

Amanda,

On 07/07/2020 22:54, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:

Peter, should we go ahead?


yes, please.

thanks,
Peter



thanks,
Amanda

On Tue Jul 07 20:14:48 2020, a...@cisco.com wrote:

Gunter is on vacation...
Thanks,
Acee

On 7/6/20, 1:14 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" 
wrote:

Hi Ketan, Peter,

I believe we're waiting for Gunter to approve as the remaining expert,
but we can move ahead if Peter confirms that we don't need to wait.

Best regards,
Amanda

On Mon Jul 06 03:46:02 2020, ket...@cisco.com wrote:

Hi Amanda/All,

I thought that there was an agreement to assign bit 0x0010 for
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x0020 for draft-ietf-
lsr-
dynamic-flooding?

Thanks,
Ketan

-Original Message-
  From: Amanda Baber via RT 
Sent: 04 July 2020 07:53
To: Acee Lindem (acee) 
Cc: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) ; mraj...@juniper.net;
lsr@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ;
gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com; aretana.i...@gmail.com;
alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com; acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org
Subject: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-
ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

Hi Peter, all,


For both Peter and Gunter: the Flooding Request bit registration
is
described in the registry as a temporary allocation, but this may
have been an mistake The RFC 7120 temporary early allocation
procedure is meant for registries that require RFC publication
for
permanent registration. In theory, if the experts agree,
permanent
registrations can be made in Expert Review registries at any
time.
Would there be an issue with removing the "TEMPORARY" designation
from that registration?


please go ahead and remove the TEMPORARY.


The "TEMPORARY" designation has been removed from the draft-ietf-lsr-
dynamic-flooding registration in LLS Type 1 Extended Options and
Flags, currently still assigned 0x0010:

https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs

thanks,
Amanda









___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr


Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-07-07 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Gunter is on vacation... 
Thanks,
Acee

On 7/6/20, 1:14 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT"  wrote:

Hi Ketan, Peter,

I believe we're waiting for Gunter to approve as the remaining expert, but 
we can move ahead if Peter confirms that we don't need to wait.

Best regards,
Amanda

On Mon Jul 06 03:46:02 2020, ket...@cisco.com wrote:
> Hi Amanda/All,
> 
> I thought that there was an agreement to assign bit 0x0010 for
> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x0020 for draft-ietf-lsr-
> dynamic-flooding?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ketan
> 
> -Original Message-
>  From: Amanda Baber via RT 
> Sent: 04 July 2020 07:53
> To: Acee Lindem (acee) 
> Cc: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) ; mraj...@juniper.net;
> lsr@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ;
> gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com; aretana.i...@gmail.com;
> alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com; acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org
    > Subject: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-
> ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode
> 
> Hi Peter, all,
> 
> > > For both Peter and Gunter: the Flooding Request bit registration is
> > > described in the registry as a temporary allocation, but this may
> > > have been an mistake The RFC 7120 temporary early allocation
> > > procedure is meant for registries that require RFC publication for
> > > permanent registration. In theory, if the experts agree, permanent
> > > registrations can be made in Expert Review registries at any time.
> > > Would there be an issue with removing the "TEMPORARY" designation
> > > from that registration?
> >
> > please go ahead and remove the TEMPORARY.
> 
> The "TEMPORARY" designation has been removed from the draft-ietf-lsr-
> dynamic-flooding registration in LLS Type 1 Extended Options and
> Flags, currently still assigned 0x0010:
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs
> 
> thanks,
> Amanda


___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr


Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-07-05 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hi Amanda/All,

I thought that there was an agreement to assign bit 0x0010 for 
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x0020 for 
draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding?

Thanks,
Ketan

-Original Message-
From: Amanda Baber via RT  
Sent: 04 July 2020 07:53
To: Acee Lindem (acee) 
Cc: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) ; mraj...@juniper.net; 
lsr@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; 
gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com; aretana.i...@gmail.com; 
alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com; acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org
Subject: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for 
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

Hi Peter, all,

> > For both Peter and Gunter: the Flooding Request bit registration is 
> > described in the registry as a temporary allocation, but this may 
> > have been an mistake The RFC 7120 temporary early allocation 
> > procedure is meant for registries that require RFC publication for 
> > permanent registration. In theory, if the experts agree, permanent 
> > registrations can be made in Expert Review registries at any time.
> > Would there be an issue with removing the "TEMPORARY" designation 
> > from that registration?
> 
> please go ahead and remove the TEMPORARY.

The "TEMPORARY" designation has been removed from the 
draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding registration in LLS Type 1 Extended Options and 
Flags, currently still assigned 0x0010:

https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs

thanks,
Amanda
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr


Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-07-03 Thread Peter Psenak

Hi Amanda,

On 03/07/2020 01:55, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:

Gunter, as the remaining LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags expert, do you 
agree with the proposal to move the Flooding Request bit registration to 
0x0020 and assign 0x0010 to this document?

For both Peter and Gunter: the Flooding Request bit registration is described in the 
registry as a temporary allocation, but this may have been an mistake The RFC 7120 
temporary early allocation procedure is meant for registries that require RFC publication 
for permanent registration. In theory, if the experts agree, permanent registrations can 
be made in Expert Review registries at any time. Would there be an issue with removing 
the "TEMPORARY" designation from that registration?


please go ahead and remove the TEMPORARY.

thanks,
Peter



thanks,
Amanda

On Thu Jul 02 14:25:01 2020, ppse...@cisco.com wrote:

Hi Alvaro,

On 02/07/2020 16:04, Alvaro Retana wrote:

Acee:

Can you please get positive confirmation from the authors of
draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding?


I'm one of them and I can confirm for myself.

thanks,
Peter




Thanks!

Alvaro.

On July 2, 2020 at 5:50:06 AM, Acee Lindem (acee)
(acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org
<mailto:acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>) wrote:


Right - the in-progress dynamic flooding implementations are IS-IS
rather than OSPF. I agree that moving the OSPF dynamic flooding is
safter.

Thanks,
Acee

On 7/2/20, 3:49 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" mailto:ket...@cisco.com>> wrote:

+1

-Original Message-
From: Peter Psenak mailto:ppse...@cisco.com>>
Sent: 02 July 2020 13:11
  To: Acee Lindem (acee) mailto:a...@cisco.com>>;
iana-prot-pa...@iana.org <mailto:iana-prot-pa...@iana.org>
  Cc: lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
  mailto:ket...@cisco.com>>;
  gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com
<mailto:gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com>;
alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com <mailto:alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com>
  Subject: Re: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

Hi Ketan, Acee,

On 01/07/2020 23:24, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:

Hi Amanda,

On 7/1/20, 5:10 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" mailto:iana-prot-pa...@iana.org>> wrote:

Hi Acee, Alvaro, all,

Alvaro: can you approve the request for early registration of the
B-bit in the LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags registry at
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs?

Acee, Ketan: the document says that it's registering 0x0010,
but that value was allocated to draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding
last year. If Alvaro approves, should we register 0x0020
instead?


I doubt there is any OSPF implementation of
draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding, so it may be safer to use the
0x0010 for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x0020
for
draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding.

thanks,
Peter



Yes. While a few implementations have the BFD strict-mode
configuration, I don't believe any have shipped the LLS signaling
yet.

Acee, Ketan, Gunter, Peter: because it's using a different
registration procedure, I'm creating a separate ticket for the
Link Local Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) registration.
I'll send an expert review request from that ticket.

Fine - Thanks,
Acee

Best regards,

Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist

On Wed Jul 01 19:38:00 2020, a...@cisco.com
<mailto:a...@cisco.com> wrote:

Hi Ketan, IANA, Alvaro,
I don't see any problem with early allocation of this LLS bit
and TLV
- pretty straight forward. It would make sense to put the
respective
registries in the IANA section (included below for info).

Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Link Local Signalling (LLS) -
Type/Length/Value Identifiers (TLV)
Link Local Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) RFC 5613
IETF Review
LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags RFC 5613
Expert Review (Expert: Gunter Van De Velde, Peter Psenak)

For the flag, the designated experts are Gunter and Peter
(copied).

Please initiate the early allocation process pending expert and
AD
approval.
Thanks,
Acee

On 6/30/20, 4:58 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)"
mailto:ket...@cisco.com>>
  wrote: ts

Hello Acee/Chris,

The authors would like to request IANA early allocations for
this
draft.

Thanks,
Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)

-Original Message-
From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Sent: 30 June 2020 14:25
To: lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-
mode-
01.txt

Hi All,

This is mostly a refresh with editorial updates. We look forward
to
review and feedback.

Thanks,
Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)

-Original Message-
From: Lsr mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>>
On Behalf Of

internet-dra...@ietf.org <mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>

Sent: 30 June 2020 14:20
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-annou...@ietf.org>
Cc: lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>

Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-07-02 Thread Alvaro Retana
That was easy! :-)

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On July 2, 2020 at 10:24:20 AM, Peter Psenak (ppse...@cisco.com) wrote:

Hi Alvaro,

On 02/07/2020 16:04, Alvaro Retana wrote:
> Acee:
>
> Can you please get positive confirmation from the authors of
> draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding?

I'm one of them and I can confirm for myself.

thanks,
Peter


>
> Thanks!
>
> Alvaro.
>
> On July 2, 2020 at 5:50:06 AM, Acee Lindem (acee)
> (acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org
> <mailto:acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>) wrote:
>
>> Right - the in-progress dynamic flooding implementations are IS-IS
>> rather than OSPF. I agree that moving the OSPF dynamic flooding is
>> safter.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>>
>> On 7/2/20, 3:49 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" > <mailto:ket...@cisco.com>> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Peter Psenak mailto:ppse...@cisco.com>>
>> Sent: 02 July 2020 13:11
>> To: Acee Lindem (acee) mailto:a...@cisco.com>>;
>> iana-prot-pa...@iana.org <mailto:iana-prot-pa...@iana.org>
>> Cc: lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
>> mailto:ket...@cisco.com>>;
>> gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com <mailto:gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com>;
>> alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com <mailto:alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com>
>> Subject: Re: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for
>> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode
>>
>> Hi Ketan, Acee,
>>
>> On 01/07/2020 23:24, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>> > Hi Amanda,
>> >
>> > On 7/1/20, 5:10 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" mailto:iana-prot-pa...@iana.org>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Acee, Alvaro, all,
>> >
>> > Alvaro: can you approve the request for early registration of the
B-bit in the LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags registry at
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs?
>> >
>> > Acee, Ketan: the document says that it's registering 0x0010, but
that value was allocated to draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding last year. If
Alvaro approves, should we register 0x0020 instead?
>>
>> I doubt there is any OSPF implementation of
>> draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding, so it may be safer to use the
>> 0x0010 for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x0020 for
>> draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Peter
>>
>> >
>> > Yes. While a few implementations have the BFD strict-mode
configuration, I don't believe any have shipped the LLS signaling yet.
>> >
>> > Acee, Ketan, Gunter, Peter: because it's using a different
registration procedure, I'm creating a separate ticket for the Link Local
Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) registration. I'll send an expert
review request from that ticket.
>> >
>> > Fine - Thanks,
>> > Acee
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Amanda Baber
>> > Lead IANA Services Specialist
>> >
>> > On Wed Jul 01 19:38:00 2020, a...@cisco.com <mailto:a...@cisco.com>
wrote:
>> > > Hi Ketan, IANA, Alvaro,
>> > > I don't see any problem with early allocation of this LLS bit and
TLV
>> > > - pretty straight forward. It would make sense to put the respective
>> > > registries in the IANA section (included below for info).
>> > >
>> > > Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Link Local Signalling (LLS) -
>> > > Type/Length/Value Identifiers (TLV)
>> > > Link Local Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) RFC 5613
>> > > IETF Review
>> > > LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags RFC 5613
>> > > Expert Review (Expert: Gunter Van De Velde, Peter Psenak)
>> > >
>> > > For the flag, the designated experts are Gunter and Peter (copied).
>> > >
>> > > Please initiate the early allocation process pending expert and AD
>> > > approval.
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Acee
>> > >
>> > > On 6/30/20, 4:58 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" mailto:ket...@cisco.com>>
>> > > wrote: ts
>> > >
>> > > Hello Acee/Chris,
>> > >
>> > > The authors would like to request IANA early allocations for this
>> > > draft.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
>> > >
>> > > -Original Message-
>> > > From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
>> > > Sent: 30 June 2020 14:25
>> > > To: lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr

Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-07-02 Thread Peter Psenak

Hi Alvaro,

On 02/07/2020 16:04, Alvaro Retana wrote:

Acee:

Can you please get positive confirmation from the authors of 
draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding?


I'm one of them and I can confirm for myself.

thanks,
Peter




Thanks!

Alvaro.

On July 2, 2020 at 5:50:06 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) 
(acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org 
<mailto:acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>) wrote:


Right - the in-progress dynamic flooding implementations are IS-IS 
rather than OSPF. I agree that moving the OSPF dynamic flooding is 
safter.


Thanks,
Acee

On 7/2/20, 3:49 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <mailto:ket...@cisco.com>> wrote:


+1

-Original Message-
From: Peter Psenak mailto:ppse...@cisco.com>>
Sent: 02 July 2020 13:11
To: Acee Lindem (acee) mailto:a...@cisco.com>>; 
iana-prot-pa...@iana.org <mailto:iana-prot-pa...@iana.org>
Cc: lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) 
mailto:ket...@cisco.com>>; 
gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com <mailto:gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com>; 
alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com <mailto:alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com>
Subject: Re: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for 
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode


Hi Ketan, Acee,

On 01/07/2020 23:24, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Hi Amanda, 
> 
> On 7/1/20, 5:10 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" mailto:iana-prot-pa...@iana.org>> wrote:
> 
> Hi Acee, Alvaro, all, 
> 
> Alvaro: can you approve the request for early registration of the B-bit in the LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags registry at https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs?
> 
> Acee, Ketan: the document says that it's registering 0x0010, but that value was allocated to draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding last year. If Alvaro approves, should we register 0x0020 instead? 

I doubt there is any OSPF implementation of 
draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding, so it may be safer to use the
0x0010 for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x0020 for 
draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding.


thanks,
Peter

> 
> Yes. While a few implementations have the BFD strict-mode configuration, I don't believe any have shipped the LLS signaling yet. 
> 
> Acee, Ketan, Gunter, Peter: because it's using a different registration procedure, I'm creating a separate ticket for the Link Local Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) registration. I'll send an expert review request from that ticket. 
> 
> Fine - Thanks, 
> Acee 
> 
> Best regards, 
> 
> Amanda Baber 
> Lead IANA Services Specialist 
> 
> On Wed Jul 01 19:38:00 2020, a...@cisco.com <mailto:a...@cisco.com> wrote:
> > Hi Ketan, IANA, Alvaro, 
> > I don't see any problem with early allocation of this LLS bit and TLV 
> > - pretty straight forward. It would make sense to put the respective 
> > registries in the IANA section (included below for info). 
> > 
> > Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Link Local Signalling (LLS) - 
> > Type/Length/Value Identifiers (TLV) 
> > Link Local Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) RFC 5613 
> > IETF Review 
> > LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags RFC 5613 
> > Expert Review (Expert: Gunter Van De Velde, Peter Psenak) 
> > 
> > For the flag, the designated experts are Gunter and Peter (copied). 
> > 
> > Please initiate the early allocation process pending expert and AD 
> > approval. 
> > Thanks, 
> > Acee 
> > 
> > On 6/30/20, 4:58 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" mailto:ket...@cisco.com>>
> > wrote: ts 
> > 
> > Hello Acee/Chris, 
> > 
> > The authors would like to request IANA early allocations for this 
> > draft. 
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors) 
> > 
> > -Original Message- 
> > From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) 
> > Sent: 30 June 2020 14:25 
> > To: lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
> > Subject: RE: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode- 
> > 01.txt 
> > 
> > Hi All, 
> > 
> > This is mostly a refresh with editorial updates. We look forward to 
> > review and feedback. 
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors) 
> > 
> > -Original Message- 
> > From: Lsr mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of 
internet-dra...@ietf.org <mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>
> > Sent: 30 June 2020 14:20 
> > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-annou...@ietf.org>

> > Cc: lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
> > Subject: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.txt 
> > 
> > 
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
> > directories. 
> > This draft is a work

Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-07-02 Thread Alvaro Retana
Acee:

Can you please get positive confirmation from the authors of
draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding?

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On July 2, 2020 at 5:50:06 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) (
acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org) wrote:

Right - the in-progress dynamic flooding implementations are IS-IS rather
than OSPF. I agree that moving the OSPF dynamic flooding is safter.

Thanks,
Acee

On 7/2/20, 3:49 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)"  wrote:

+1

-Original Message-
From: Peter Psenak 
Sent: 02 July 2020 13:11
To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; iana-prot-pa...@iana.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ;
gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com; alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com
Subject: Re: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

Hi Ketan, Acee,

On 01/07/2020 23:24, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Hi Amanda,
>
> On 7/1/20, 5:10 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" 
wrote:
>
> Hi Acee, Alvaro, all,
>
> Alvaro: can you approve the request for early registration of the B-bit
in the LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags registry at
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs?
>
> Acee, Ketan: the document says that it's registering 0x0010, but that
value was allocated to draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding last year. If Alvaro
approves, should we register 0x0020 instead?

I doubt there is any OSPF implementation of
draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding, so it may be safer to use the
0x0010 for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x0020 for
draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding.

thanks,
Peter

>
> Yes. While a few implementations have the BFD strict-mode configuration,
I don't believe any have shipped the LLS signaling yet.
>
> Acee, Ketan, Gunter, Peter: because it's using a different registration
procedure, I'm creating a separate ticket for the Link Local Signalling TLV
Identifiers (LLS Types) registration. I'll send an expert review request
from that ticket.
>
> Fine - Thanks,
> Acee
>
> Best regards,
>
> Amanda Baber
> Lead IANA Services Specialist
>
> On Wed Jul 01 19:38:00 2020, a...@cisco.com wrote:
> > Hi Ketan, IANA, Alvaro,
> > I don't see any problem with early allocation of this LLS bit and TLV
> > - pretty straight forward. It would make sense to put the respective
> > registries in the IANA section (included below for info).
> >
> > Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Link Local Signalling (LLS) -
> > Type/Length/Value Identifiers (TLV)
> > Link Local Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) RFC 5613
> > IETF Review
> > LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags RFC 5613
> > Expert Review (Expert: Gunter Van De Velde, Peter Psenak)
> >
> > For the flag, the designated experts are Gunter and Peter (copied).
> >
> > Please initiate the early allocation process pending expert and AD
> > approval.
> > Thanks,
> > Acee
> >
> > On 6/30/20, 4:58 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" 
> > wrote: ts
> >
> > Hello Acee/Chris,
> >
> > The authors would like to request IANA early allocations for this
> > draft.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
> > Sent: 30 June 2020 14:25
> > To: lsr@ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-
> > 01.txt
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This is mostly a refresh with editorial updates. We look forward to
> > review and feedback.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lsr  On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org
> > Sent: 30 June 2020 14:20
> > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
> > Cc: lsr@ietf.org
> > Subject: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.txt
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> > directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
> >
> > Title : OSPF Strict-Mode for BFD
> > Authors : Ketan Talaulikar
> > Peter Psenak
> > Albert Fu
> > Rajesh M
> > Filename : draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.txt
> > Pages : 10
> > Date : 2020-06-30
> >
> > Abstract:
> > This document specifies the extensions to OSPF that enable an OSPF
> > router to signal the requirement for a Bidirectional Forwarding
> > Detection (BFD) session prior to adjacency formation. Link-Local
> > Signaling (LLS) is used to advertise this requirement of "strict-
> > mode" of BFD session establishment for OSPF adjacency. If both
> > OSPF
> > neighbors advertise the "strict-mode" of BFD, a

Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-07-02 Thread Alvaro Retana
I approve… :-)

On July 1, 2020 at 7:20:40 PM, Amanda Baber via RT (iana-prot-pa...@iana.org)
wrote:

Hi Alvaro,

Sorry, I asked you to approve the wrong registration!

Can you approve "Local Interface IPv4 Address TLV" (suggested value 21) in
the Link Local Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) registry?

Also, should "TLV" be removed from the name of the registration? It looks
like it's included about half the time.

https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01#section-7

thanks,
Amanda
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr


Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-07-02 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Right - the in-progress dynamic flooding implementations are IS-IS rather than 
OSPF. I agree that moving the OSPF dynamic flooding is safter. 

Thanks,
Acee

On 7/2/20, 3:49 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)"  wrote:

+1

-Original Message-
From: Peter Psenak  
Sent: 02 July 2020 13:11
To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; iana-prot-pa...@iana.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; 
gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com; alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com
    Subject: Re: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for 
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

Hi Ketan, Acee,

On 01/07/2020 23:24, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Hi Amanda,
> 
> On 7/1/20, 5:10 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT"  
wrote:
> 
>  Hi Acee, Alvaro, all,
> 
>  Alvaro: can you approve the request for early registration of the 
B-bit in the LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags registry at 
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs?
> 
>  Acee, Ketan: the document says that it's registering 0x0010, but 
that value was allocated to draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding last year. If 
Alvaro approves, should we register 0x0020 instead?

I doubt there is any OSPF implementation of 
draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding, so it may be safer to use the
0x0010 for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x0020 for 
draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding.

thanks,
Peter

> 
> Yes. While a few implementations have the BFD strict-mode configuration, 
I don't believe any have shipped the LLS signaling yet.
> 
>  Acee, Ketan, Gunter, Peter: because it's using a different 
registration procedure, I'm creating a separate ticket for the Link Local 
Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) registration. I'll send an expert review 
request from that ticket.
> 
> Fine - Thanks,
> Acee
> 
>  Best regards,
> 
>  Amanda Baber
>  Lead IANA Services Specialist
> 
>  On Wed Jul 01 19:38:00 2020, a...@cisco.com wrote:
>  > Hi Ketan,  IANA, Alvaro,
>  > I don't see any problem with early allocation of this LLS bit and 
TLV
>  > - pretty straight forward. It would make sense to put the 
respective
>  > registries in the IANA section (included below for info).
>  >
>  > Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Link Local Signalling (LLS) -
>  > Type/Length/Value Identifiers (TLV)
>  >   Link Local Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) RFC 5613
>  >   IETF Review
>  >   LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags RFC 5613
>  >  Expert Review (Expert: Gunter Van De Velde, Peter 
Psenak)
>  >
>  > For the flag, the designated experts are Gunter and Peter (copied).
>  >
>  > Please initiate the early allocation process pending expert and AD
>  > approval.
>  > Thanks,
>  > Acee
>  >
>  > On 6/30/20, 4:58 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" 
>  > wrote: ts
>  >
>  > Hello Acee/Chris,
>  >
>  > The authors would like to request IANA early allocations for this
>  > draft.
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
>  >
>  > -Original Message-
>  >  From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
>  > Sent: 30 June 2020 14:25
>  > To: lsr@ietf.org
>  > Subject: RE: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-
>  > 01.txt
>  >
>  > Hi All,
>  >
>  > This is mostly a refresh with editorial updates. We look forward to
>  > review and feedback.
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
>  >
>  > -Original Message-
>  > From: Lsr  On Behalf Of 
internet-dra...@ietf.org
>  > Sent: 30 June 2020 14:20
>  > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
>  > Cc: lsr@ietf.org
>  > Subject: [Lsr] I-D Action: 
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.txt
>  >
>  >
>  > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>  > directories.
>  > This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
>  >
>  > Title   : OSPF Strict-Mode for BFD
>  > Authors : Ketan Talaulikar
>  >   Peter Psenak
>  >

Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-07-02 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
+1

-Original Message-
From: Peter Psenak  
Sent: 02 July 2020 13:11
To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; iana-prot-pa...@iana.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; 
gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com; alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com
Subject: Re: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for 
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

Hi Ketan, Acee,

On 01/07/2020 23:24, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Hi Amanda,
> 
> On 7/1/20, 5:10 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT"  wrote:
> 
>  Hi Acee, Alvaro, all,
> 
>  Alvaro: can you approve the request for early registration of the B-bit 
> in the LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags registry at 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs?
> 
>  Acee, Ketan: the document says that it's registering 0x0010, but 
> that value was allocated to draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding last year. If 
> Alvaro approves, should we register 0x0020 instead?

I doubt there is any OSPF implementation of draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding, so 
it may be safer to use the
0x0010 for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x0020 for 
draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding.

thanks,
Peter

> 
> Yes. While a few implementations have the BFD strict-mode configuration, I 
> don't believe any have shipped the LLS signaling yet.
> 
>  Acee, Ketan, Gunter, Peter: because it's using a different registration 
> procedure, I'm creating a separate ticket for the Link Local Signalling TLV 
> Identifiers (LLS Types) registration. I'll send an expert review request from 
> that ticket.
> 
> Fine - Thanks,
> Acee
> 
>  Best regards,
> 
>  Amanda Baber
>  Lead IANA Services Specialist
> 
>  On Wed Jul 01 19:38:00 2020, a...@cisco.com wrote:
>  > Hi Ketan,  IANA, Alvaro,
>  > I don't see any problem with early allocation of this LLS bit and TLV
>  > - pretty straight forward. It would make sense to put the respective
>  > registries in the IANA section (included below for info).
>  >
>  > Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Link Local Signalling (LLS) -
>  > Type/Length/Value Identifiers (TLV)
>  >   Link Local Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) RFC 5613
>  >   IETF Review
>  >   LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags RFC 5613
>  >  Expert Review (Expert: Gunter Van De Velde, Peter Psenak)
>  >
>  > For the flag, the designated experts are Gunter and Peter (copied).
>  >
>  > Please initiate the early allocation process pending expert and AD
>  > approval.
>  > Thanks,
>  > Acee
>  >
>  > On 6/30/20, 4:58 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" 
>  > wrote: ts
>  >
>  > Hello Acee/Chris,
>  >
>  > The authors would like to request IANA early allocations for this
>  > draft.
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
>  >
>  > -Original Message-
>  >  From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
>  > Sent: 30 June 2020 14:25
>  > To: lsr@ietf.org
>  > Subject: RE: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-
>  > 01.txt
>  >
>  > Hi All,
>  >
>  > This is mostly a refresh with editorial updates. We look forward to
>  > review and feedback.
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
>  >
>  > -Original Message-
>  > From: Lsr  On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org
>  > Sent: 30 June 2020 14:20
>  > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
>  > Cc: lsr@ietf.org
>  > Subject: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.txt
>  >
>  >
>  > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>  > directories.
>  > This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
>  >
>  > Title   : OSPF Strict-Mode for BFD
>  > Authors : Ketan Talaulikar
>  >   Peter Psenak
>  >   Albert Fu
>  >   Rajesh M
>  > Filename: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.txt
>  > Pages   : 10
>  > Date: 2020-06-30
>  >
>  > Abstract:
>  >This document specifies the extensions to OSPF that enable an OSPF
>  >router to signal the requirement for a Bidirectional Forwarding
>  >Detection (BFD) session prior to adjacency formation.  Link-Local
>  >Signaling (LLS) is used to advertise this requirement o

Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-07-02 Thread Peter Psenak

Hi Ketan, Acee,

On 01/07/2020 23:24, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:

Hi Amanda,

On 7/1/20, 5:10 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT"  wrote:

 Hi Acee, Alvaro, all,

 Alvaro: can you approve the request for early registration of the B-bit in 
the LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags registry at 
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs?

 Acee, Ketan: the document says that it's registering 0x0010, but that 
value was allocated to draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding last year. If Alvaro 
approves, should we register 0x0020 instead?


I doubt there is any OSPF implementation of 
draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding, so it may be safer to use the 
0x0010 for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x0020 for 
draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding.


thanks,
Peter



Yes. While a few implementations have the BFD strict-mode configuration, I 
don't believe any have shipped the LLS signaling yet.

 Acee, Ketan, Gunter, Peter: because it's using a different registration 
procedure, I'm creating a separate ticket for the Link Local Signalling TLV 
Identifiers (LLS Types) registration. I'll send an expert review request from 
that ticket.

Fine - Thanks,
Acee

 Best regards,

 Amanda Baber
 Lead IANA Services Specialist

 On Wed Jul 01 19:38:00 2020, a...@cisco.com wrote:
 > Hi Ketan,  IANA, Alvaro,
 > I don't see any problem with early allocation of this LLS bit and TLV
 > - pretty straight forward. It would make sense to put the respective
 > registries in the IANA section (included below for info).
 >
 > Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Link Local Signalling (LLS) -
 > Type/Length/Value Identifiers (TLV)
 >   Link Local Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) RFC 5613
 >   IETF Review
 >   LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags RFC 5613
 >  Expert Review (Expert: Gunter Van De Velde, Peter Psenak)
 >
 > For the flag, the designated experts are Gunter and Peter (copied).
 >
 > Please initiate the early allocation process pending expert and AD
 > approval.
 > Thanks,
 > Acee
 >
 > On 6/30/20, 4:58 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" 
 > wrote: ts
 >
 > Hello Acee/Chris,
 >
 > The authors would like to request IANA early allocations for this
 > draft.
 >
 > Thanks,
 > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
 >
 > -Original Message-
 >  From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
 > Sent: 30 June 2020 14:25
 > To: lsr@ietf.org
 > Subject: RE: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-
 > 01.txt
 >
 > Hi All,
 >
 > This is mostly a refresh with editorial updates. We look forward to
 > review and feedback.
 >
 > Thanks,
 > Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
 >
 > -Original Message-
 > From: Lsr  On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org
 > Sent: 30 June 2020 14:20
 > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
 > Cc: lsr@ietf.org
 > Subject: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.txt
 >
 >
 > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
 > directories.
 > This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
 >
 > Title   : OSPF Strict-Mode for BFD
 > Authors : Ketan Talaulikar
 >   Peter Psenak
 >   Albert Fu
 >   Rajesh M
 > Filename: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.txt
 > Pages   : 10
 > Date: 2020-06-30
 >
 > Abstract:
 >This document specifies the extensions to OSPF that enable an OSPF
 >router to signal the requirement for a Bidirectional Forwarding
 >Detection (BFD) session prior to adjacency formation.  Link-Local
 >Signaling (LLS) is used to advertise this requirement of "strict-
 >mode" of BFD session establishment for OSPF adjacency.  If both
 > OSPF
 >neighbors advertise the "strict-mode" of BFD, adjacency formation
 >will be blocked until a BFD session has been successfully
 >established.
 >
 >
 > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode/
 >
 > There are also htmlized versions available at:
 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01
 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-
 > mode-01
 >
 > A diff from the previous version is available at:
 > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-
 > 01
 >
 >
 > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
 > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
 > tools.ietf.org.
 >
 > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
 > 

Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-07-01 Thread Alvaro Retana
Amanda;

Hi!

Yes, I approve.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On July 1, 2020 at 5:11:01 PM, Amanda Baber via RT (iana-prot-pa...@iana.org)
wrote:


Alvaro: can you approve the request for early registration of the B-bit in
the LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags registry at
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs?
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr


Re: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

2020-07-01 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Amanda, 

On 7/1/20, 5:10 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT"  wrote:

Hi Acee, Alvaro, all,

Alvaro: can you approve the request for early registration of the B-bit in 
the LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags registry at 
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs?

Acee, Ketan: the document says that it's registering 0x0010, but that 
value was allocated to draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding last year. If Alvaro 
approves, should we register 0x0020 instead?

Yes. While a few implementations have the BFD strict-mode configuration, I 
don't believe any have shipped the LLS signaling yet. 

Acee, Ketan, Gunter, Peter: because it's using a different registration 
procedure, I'm creating a separate ticket for the Link Local Signalling TLV 
Identifiers (LLS Types) registration. I'll send an expert review request from 
that ticket.

Fine - Thanks,
Acee

Best regards,

Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist

On Wed Jul 01 19:38:00 2020, a...@cisco.com wrote:
> Hi Ketan,  IANA, Alvaro,
> I don't see any problem with early allocation of this LLS bit and TLV
> - pretty straight forward. It would make sense to put the respective
> registries in the IANA section (included below for info).
> 
> Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Link Local Signalling (LLS) -
> Type/Length/Value Identifiers (TLV)
>   Link Local Signalling TLV Identifiers (LLS Types) RFC 5613
>   IETF Review
>   LLS Type 1 Extended Options and Flags RFC 5613
>  Expert Review (Expert: Gunter Van De Velde, Peter Psenak)
> 
> For the flag, the designated experts are Gunter and Peter (copied).
> 
> Please initiate the early allocation process pending expert and AD
> approval.
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
> On 6/30/20, 4:58 AM, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" 
> wrote: ts
> 
> Hello Acee/Chris,
> 
> The authors would like to request IANA early allocations for this
> draft.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
> 
> -Original Message-
>  From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
> Sent: 30 June 2020 14:25
> To: lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-
> 01.txt
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> This is mostly a refresh with editorial updates. We look forward to
> review and feedback.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ketan (on behalf of co-authors)
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Lsr  On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org
> Sent: 30 June 2020 14:20
> To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
> Cc: lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
> 
> Title   : OSPF Strict-Mode for BFD
> Authors : Ketan Talaulikar
>   Peter Psenak
>   Albert Fu
>   Rajesh M
> Filename: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.txt
> Pages   : 10
> Date: 2020-06-30
> 
> Abstract:
>This document specifies the extensions to OSPF that enable an OSPF
>router to signal the requirement for a Bidirectional Forwarding
>Detection (BFD) session prior to adjacency formation.  Link-Local
>Signaling (LLS) is used to advertise this requirement of "strict-
>mode" of BFD session establishment for OSPF adjacency.  If both
> OSPF
>neighbors advertise the "strict-mode" of BFD, adjacency formation
>will be blocked until a BFD session has been successfully
>established.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-
> mode-01
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-
> 01
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
> tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> 
> ___
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
> 


___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr