Alvaro –
Responses inline.
From: Alvaro Retana
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2019 2:22 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ;
draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensi...@ietf.org
Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; Uma Chunduri
Subject: RE: AD Review of draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-22
On March 29, 2019 at 1:55:17 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) (ginsb...@cisco.com)
wrote:
Les:
Hi!
Thanks for the update.
I have a couple of comments on your replies — no showstoppers. However, it
looks like my original comments were truncated; I added the remaining
comments at the end.
I am
Alvaro -
Thanx for the excellent review.
V23 of the draft has been posted
Please review and verify that all comments have been addressed to your
satisfaction - subject to my responses inline below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alvaro Retana
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 3:21 PM
>
Alvaro -
From: Alvaro Retana
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 10:52 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ;
draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensi...@ietf.org
Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; Uma Chunduri
Subject: RE: AD Review of draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-22
On March 20, 2019
On March 20, 2019 at 7:37:42 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) (ginsb...@cisco.com)
wrote:
Les:
Hi!
In regards to the relationship with RFC 7794, there is a history here.
Thanks for the history lesson! :-)
To avoid more confusion (specially from other reviewers), I think that it
would be a good
Alvaro -
Thanx for the review.
We will work on addressing the comments.
In regards to the relationship with RFC 7794, there is a history here.
The N and R flags were originally defined as part of the prefix-sid sub-TLV in
early versions of this draft. However, it was realized that there were
Thanks Alvaro for the review!
Authors - please give these comments the highest priority.
Thanks,
Acee
On 3/20/19, 6:21 PM, "Alvaro Retana" wrote:
Dear authors:
I just finished reviewing this document. Please take a look at the in-line
comments below. In general, I think
