Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-igp-extensions-ifit-00.txt

2020-07-20 Thread Christian Hopps
So full speed ahead and ignoring the views expressed in the LSR WG? This is not a recipe for success if you are basing your implementation on using LSR protocols. Thanks, Chris. [As WG member] > On Jul 19, 2020, at 9:30 PM, qinfengwei wrote: > > Hi, > IFIT Capability Advertisement

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-igp-extensions-ifit-00.txt

2020-07-17 Thread Tianran Zhou
04:34:51 主 题:Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-igp-extensions-ifit-00.txt Robin/Yali – The argument here is circular. You are saying “if the IGPs advertised ifit information/capability then it would be used”. Sure. But the question that was discussed three back was whether

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-igp-extensions-ifit-00.txt

2020-07-17 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
<mailto:lsr@ietf.org> 主题: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-igp-extensions-ifit-00.txt Dear Les, Many thanks for your quick feedback. We are very appreciate all of your insightful comments and advices. ☺ Please let me clarify the one of requirements is that the ingress node

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-igp-extensions-ifit-00.txt

2020-07-17 Thread wangyali
Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-igp-extensions-ifit-00.txt Yali - While it is kind of you to acknowledge many of us for our comments, in many cases (myself included) what we told you is that this does not belong in the IGPs. Putting out a new draft which continues to push

Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-igp-extensions-ifit-00.txt

2020-07-16 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Yali - While it is kind of you to acknowledge many of us for our comments, in many cases (myself included) what we told you is that this does not belong in the IGPs. Putting out a new draft which continues to push for advertising ifit in IGPs (even if in different TLVs) does not indicate