Uma –
Thank you.
I have posted a new version (17) with the previously provided changes.
Les
From: Uma Chunduri
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 9:21 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensi...@ietf.org;
lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org
Les,
Thanks for your quick response and changes in the document. Please find my
further response below* [Uma]:*
--
Uma C.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <
ginsb...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Uma –
>
>
>
> Thanx for the prompt review.
>
>
>
> 2. Section 2.1
>
>
>
> a. "The
Uma,
Wrt number of authors, if I recall correctly (I don’t have pointers to the
discussion anymore), given the lengths and involvement of the authors currently
on the front page, as an exception - both ospf and isis sr drafts would keep
the initial number of authors.
Thanks,
Jeff
> On Jun
Uma –
One item I forgot…there are no meaningful nits.
Idnits reports:
-- Looks like a reference, but probably isn't: '100' on line 1009
'SRGB = [100, 199]...'
-- Looks like a reference, but probably isn't: '199' on line 1009
'SRGB = [100, 199]...'
-- Looks like a reference, but
