Hi!
Pushed, thanks.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chru...@suse.cz
--
___
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
Hi Subrata,
I have installed LTP on SUSE. I want to run numa testcases. I have done
below steps to run numa.
___
perf2877:/vijay/NUMA/ltp-full-20150420 # ./runltp -f numa
FATAL: LTP not installed correctly
INFO: Follow
Hi,
I have installed LTP on SUSE. I want to run numa testcases. I have done
below steps to run numa.
___
perf2877:/vijay/NUMA/ltp-full-20150420 # ./runltp -f numa
FATAL: LTP not installed correctly
INFO: Follow directions
Hi,
On 08/03/2015 05:59 PM, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
Hi!
Some switches need a while to learn the new assigned address, which make the
connectivity check failed. Make PING_MAX adjustable to let user can
pre-define
it based on their own environment.
I still think that the less parameters user has
Hi,
Below output is for /opt/ltp/runltp -f numa command . Please
correct me if I have done any mistake.
___
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (ppc64)
VERSION = 11
PATCHLEVEL = 4
Hi!
Hi Subrata,
As far as I know Subrata is not active in LTP development for quite some
time.
I have installed LTP on SUSE. I want to run numa testcases. I have done
below steps to run numa.
___
Hi!
Pushed, thanks.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chru...@suse.cz
--
___
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
Signed-off-by: Zeng Linggang zenglg...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
testcases/kernel/numa/numa01.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/numa/numa01.sh b/testcases/kernel/numa/numa01.sh
index be36af3..9c5f49a 100755
--- a/testcases/kernel/numa/numa01.sh
+++
Hi!
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgrcv/msgrcv08.c
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2015 Author: Gabriellla Schmidt g...@bruker.de
+ * Modify: Li Wang liw...@redhat.com
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Cyril Hrubis chru...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi!
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgrcv/msgrcv08.c
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2015 Author: Gabriellla Schmidt g...@bruker.de
+ * Modify: Li Wang
Hi!
Pushed, thanks.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chru...@suse.cz
--
___
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
Hi!
I've fixed the call to tst_require_root() (since I've removed the unused
parameter today) and pushed this test, thanks.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chru...@suse.cz
--
___
Ltp-list
Hi!
+static void setup(void);
+static void umount2_verify(void);
+static int umount2_verify_1(void);
+static int umount2_verify_2(void);
+static int umount2_verify_3(void);
+static void cleanup(void);
+
+char *TCID = umount2_02;
+int TST_TOTAL = 1;
This is not right. The testcase does
Hi!
+static void umount2_verify(void)
+{
+ SAFE_MOUNT(cleanup, device, MNTPOINT, fs_type, 0, NULL);
+ mount_flag = 1;
+
+ TEST(umount2(SYMLINK, UMOUNT_NOFOLLOW));
+
+ if (TEST_RETURN == 0 || TEST_ERRNO != EINVAL) {
+ tst_resm(TFAIL | TTERRNO,
+
14 matches
Mail list logo