Hi Wanlong Gao,
Thanks for your ACK. But I can't find this patch on upstream ltp repo until now.
Should I re-send the acked patch to you?
Thank you,
Zorro Lang
- 原始邮件 -
发件人: "Wanlong Gao"
收件人: "Zorro Lang"
抄送: "Xiaoguang Wang" ,
ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
发送时间: 星期三, 2014年 10 月 15日
Hi Jan and Cyril,
Thanks for your question and suggestion;)
What I mean is that:
1. errno will be set to negative when someone function run failed, but it will
not be set back to 0 when someone function return 0.
2. Usually we use *errno* after someone function(Eg: read()) return negative.
But i
Hi Cyril,
Thanks. And I have another little question about debug ltp. When I hit this
segfault I got a core file, but that core without debug information.
So I tried to add "-g" for gcc and remove "-O2" option. I did that
job manually(deleted -O2 from every files contain it).
Is there some good c
- 原始邮件 -
> 发件人: "Cyril Hrubis"
> 收件人: "Zirong Lang"
> 抄送: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> 发送时间: 星期四, 2015年 4 月 30日 下午 2:56:58
> 主题: Re: [PATCH] aiocp: modify segfault in dev_block_size_by_path
>
> Hi!
> > Thanks. And I have another l