Re: [Ltsp-discuss] offline install

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 08:32:58PM +0100, Stefan Kugler wrote: Hi! I've sucessfully tested LTSP 4.1 at home last weekend, I think that will be the future life of our old compaq deskpros... But: Is there a way for offline installation? There is only limite

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Timeout: ws001ltsp:9200 invalid argument? (success)

It certainly helped. Thanks /Poul Jim McQuillan wrote: Poul, This problem is caused by your server not having the dnsdomainname setup properly. Which normally should be Ok, but the /etc/profile.d/ltsp-sound.sh script can't handle it. You can fix it manually by editing the /etc/profile.d/

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] 2.6 kernel (SORRY, FOR THE FLOOD)

hey guys, i didnt flood this list. why should i? this list been very helpful to me. i didnt do it, dont know what happened. sorry for the inconvenience. > Hello, > > is there some kind listadmin around who can temporarily disable this > [EMAIL PROTECTED] person, since there seems to be somethi

[Ltsp-discuss] LTSP 3.0 Local Apps and ro /tmp

Title: Message Hello   I am running LTSP version 3 and I am attempting to use Local Applications.  I have copied the library's for galeon-bin across and it seems to be ready to run. However, when I do run it, it complains that /tmp is not writable.  A swift check of the permissions shows tha

[Ltsp-discuss] using lbe to compile custom apps

Hi everyone, with the help of some of you i finally figured out, that the most painless way of having firefox run on my clients, is either having my system compiled with the same version of gcc as the ltsp-4.1 is compiled - which is quite unlike, i have to admit - or getting the ltsp environmen

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] 2.6 kernel

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello! can i run ltsp on a distro with 2.6.x.x kernel? thanks! --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] option 129 values

> I'm uaing a D-Link 530TX+ REV E1 network card. > I got the etherboot rom to work, and I'm now trying to get my DHCP > file to load the correct value. I'm not quite sure what the NIC=XX > value should be. I tried "dfe538" and "rtl8139" and neither one would > low. Where do I find this value? If

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] 2.6 kernel

Hello, is there some kind listadmin around who can temporarily disable this [EMAIL PROTECTED] person, since there seems to be something running amok somewhere at the sender side, with nobody home? TIA, BR, Gudmund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello! can i run ltsp on a distro with 2.6.x.x kernel? th

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] offline install

> I've sucessfully tested LTSP 4.1 at home last weekend, I think that will > be the future life of our old compaq deskpros... > But: Is there a way for offline installation? There is only limited > bandwith at the place where I want to proceed with a test environment. The bandwidth consumed by l

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] LBE won't build for me (link error in texinfo)

Dag Sverre Seljebotn skrev: Thanks for the reply. I think you need the ncurses-dev package installed on your server. Already have it. After your earlier post today I figured I'd give up anyway until I'm back at my 2.4-kernel server (trying to set up LBE on my 2.6-kernel laptop here). All Debian,

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Re: Hard Drive Upgrade Quandry

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi we are skating on the edge of being too low on hard drive space. With careful management of the ltsp environment I think we could make do but there are several reasons I don't want to. 1. First, in most cases I am a believer in more is better, hardware wise. Wha

[Ltsp-discuss] option 129 values

Hi guys, I'm kind of stuck. I'm uaing a D-Link 530TX+ REV E1 network card. I got the etherboot rom to work, and I'm now trying to get my DHCP file to load the correct value. I'm not quite sure what the NIC=XX value should be. I tried "dfe538" and "rtl8139" and neither one would low. Where do I fi

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] 2.6 kernel

> can i run ltsp on a distro with 2.6.x.x kernel? Yes, kernel on the server doesn't matter for LTSP whatsoever. Neither does the server architechture (PowerPC, i386, etc.). You could probably run LTSP on Windows too without too many problems. All that is required is that the server can run an NFS

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] LBE won't build for me (link error in texinfo)

> We're using the sourceforge version of the patch. > > As for working with NFS, I believe that's why we are using samba and > smbmount for accessing the workstation resources from the server. Thanks, saved me some time there. (I'm not happy about samba, it keeps locking up when unplugging device

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Hard Drive Upgrade Quandry

Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote: If I am right in my understanding of raid levels 4 - 80GB drives in such a configuration will give me 160GB of storage space, with the other 160GB of the drives being used in a mirrored capacity right? I think that's right. If you have the option money-wise and th

[Ltsp-discuss] 2.6 kernel

hello! can i run ltsp on a distro with 2.6.x.x kernel? thanks! --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Sta