Re: [Ltsp-discuss] booting stalled

2008-01-14 Thread Peter Childs
On 08/01/2008, Oliver Grawert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi, > On Mo, 2008-01-07 at 21:31 +0200, Asmo Koskinen wrote: > > "While LTSP development is focused on LTSP 5, I would argue that there's > > not a significant benefit *to users* of version 5 over version 4.2. > > Therefore, in many (most

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] booting stalled

2008-01-08 Thread Subhodip Biswas
i finally managed to get a working LTSP 5 on my fedora 8 box and its working superfine . On Jan 8, 2008 11:59 PM, Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:35:08 +0100 > Oliver Grawert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > it will work from 233Mhz on with at least 48M of ram (thats

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] booting stalled

2008-01-08 Thread Frank Cox
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:35:08 +0100 Oliver Grawert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it will work from 233Mhz on with at least 48M of ram (thats teh bare > minimum though, recommended are rather 400MHz and 64M) with any sorts of > PCI cards out of the box ... That scares me a bit. Does this mean that

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] booting stalled

2008-01-08 Thread jam
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 04:36 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > so i finally managed to make LTSP 5 giving me a login screen . thanks > jam for the help . > are there any issues with LDM? . i cant login right now . When I had that problem it was because there was no xsession in /etc/X11 I needed to

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] booting stalled

2008-01-08 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, On Di, 2008-01-08 at 07:30 -0500, Rob Owens wrote: > I have not had good luck w/ anything earlier than Pentium 3 clients, > although I haven't done extensive testing. But I took my home LTSP 4.2 > system and switched to LTSP 5 and now my clients don't work (Pentium 2 > machines w/ 64 to 12

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] booting stalled

2008-01-08 Thread Rob Owens
Sebastien Koechlin wrote: > On Jan 8, 2008 10:03 AM, Oliver Grawert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> hi, >> On Mo, 2008-01-07 at 21:31 +0200, Asmo Koskinen wrote: >>> "While LTSP development is focused on LTSP 5, I would argue that there's >>> not a significant benefit *to users* of version 5 over v

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] booting stalled

2008-01-08 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, On Di, 2008-01-08 at 12:14 +0100, Sebastien Koechlin wrote: > Is LTSP5 working as well with old harware; from the Pentium and > Pentium MMX generation? Old video cards, old NIC... it will work from 233Mhz on with at least 48M of ram (thats teh bare minimum though, recommended are rather 400MHz

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] booting stalled

2008-01-08 Thread Sebastien Koechlin
On Jan 8, 2008 10:03 AM, Oliver Grawert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > On Mo, 2008-01-07 at 21:31 +0200, Asmo Koskinen wrote: > > "While LTSP development is focused on LTSP 5, I would argue that there's > > not a significant benefit *to users* of version 5 over version 4.2. > > Therefore, in ma

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] booting stalled

2008-01-08 Thread Subhodip Biswas
so i finally managed to make LTSP 5 giving me a login screen . thanks jam for the help . are there any issues with LDM? . i cant login right now . -- Regards Subhodip Biswas GPG key : FAEA34AB Server : pgp.mit.edu http://subhodipbiswas.wordpress.com http:/www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/SubhodipBiswa

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] booting stalled

2008-01-08 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, On Mo, 2008-01-07 at 21:31 +0200, Asmo Koskinen wrote: > "While LTSP development is focused on LTSP 5, I would argue that there's > not a significant benefit *to users* of version 5 over version 4.2. > Therefore, in many (most?) cases, K12LTSP 6, based on LTSP 4.2 and > Fedora 6, or K12LTSP-

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] booting stalled

2008-01-07 Thread jam
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 12:10 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > K12LTSP is not Fedora 8 and ltsp 5... > > > > There is one opinion... > > "While LTSP development is focused on LTSP 5, I would argue that > there's > not a significant benefit *to users* of version 5 over version 4.2. > Theref

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] booting stalled

2008-01-07 Thread Asmo Koskinen
Asmo Koskinen kirjoitti: > K12LTSP is not Fedora 8 and ltsp 5... > There is one opinion... "While LTSP development is focused on LTSP 5, I would argue that there's not a significant benefit *to users* of version 5 over version 4.2. Therefore, in many (most?) cases, K12LTSP 6, based on LTSP 4

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] booting stalled

2008-01-07 Thread Asmo Koskinen
Subhodip Biswas kirjoitti: > But problem is my server is running fedora 8 . K12LTSP is not Fedora 8 and ltsp 5... "K12LTSP 6.0.0 is based on Fedora Core 6, with a large number of changes including: * LTSP 4.2 update 4 * A bunch of packages from Fedora Extras * Hundreds of updated FC6 packages *

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] booting stalled

2008-01-07 Thread Asmo Koskinen
Subhodip Biswas kirjoitti: > But problem is my server is running fedora 8 . You know - you really are trying this one very very hard way... If you like RedHat/Fedora so much you better go with K12LTSP - it is based on Fedora . With Fedora 8 and ltsp 5 you are really on your own... I believe the

[Ltsp-discuss] booting stalled

2008-01-07 Thread Subhodip Biswas
HI ! i tried and installed ltsp 5 and after suitable configration i am able to get a nice ubuntu booting screen . But problem is my server is running fedora 8 . And booting has stalled . how to resolve this ? please help -- Regards Subhodip Biswas GPG key : FAEA34AB Server : pgp.mit.edu http://s