Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Too old thin client - VIA Eden CPU - 10.10 Beta

2010-10-05 Thread Horst Prote
David Hopkins wrote: On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Horst Prote pr...@fmi.uni-stuttgart.de wrote: asmo.koski...@arkki.info schrieb:     Is HP t5125 just too old? I installed 10.10 Beta as a LTSP server.     This kernel requires the following features not presented on the CPU:

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Too old thin client - VIA Eden CPU - 10.10 Beta

2010-09-25 Thread David Hopkins
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Horst Prote pr...@fmi.uni-stuttgart.de wrote: asmo.koski...@arkki.info schrieb:     Is HP t5125 just too old? I installed 10.10 Beta as a LTSP server.     This kernel requires the following features not presented on the CPU: cx8   cmov   Unable to boot -

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Too old thin client - VIA Eden CPU - 10.10 Beta

2010-09-24 Thread Horst Prote
asmo.koski...@arkki.info schrieb: Is HP t5125 just too old? I installed 10.10 Beta as a LTSP server. This kernel requires the following features not presented on the CPU: cx8 cmov Unable to boot - please use a kernel appropriate for your CPU. As the message says: please use a kernel

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Too old thin client - VIA Eden CPU - 10.10 Beta

2010-09-24 Thread Asmo Koskinen
24.09.2010 18:46, Horst Prote kirjoitti: So build the thin client kernel by hand and select the appropriate processor type. No, I keep using t5125/t5135 with Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and then switch to Debian in summer 2013. Hope they do not drop out very old hardware like VIA C3/Eden. Fedora did

[Ltsp-discuss] Too old thin client - VIA Eden CPU - 10.10 Beta

2010-09-19 Thread asmo . koskinen
Is HP t5125 just too old? I installed 10.10 Beta as a LTSP server. This kernel requires the following features not presented on the CPU: cx8 cmov Unable to boot - please use a kernel appropriate for your CPU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ltsp/+bug/642595 Best Regards Asmo Koskinen.

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Too old thin client - VIA Eden CPU - 10.10 Beta

2010-09-19 Thread Alkis Georgopoulos
Hi Asmo, Please don't file Ubuntu-specific bugs under LTSP (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ltsp/+bugs), e.g. why would the Fedora maintainer be interested in the fact that the Marevick kernel is compiled with the CONFIG_M686 enabled? File them under ubuntu-ltsp instead:

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Too old thin client - VIA Eden CPU - 10.10 Beta

2010-09-19 Thread asmo . koskinen
File them under ubuntu-ltsp instead: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ltsp/+bug/ Some links about the problem: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-m-686-compile