Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp backports

2009-04-30 Thread Chris Roberts
On Wednesday 29 Apr 2009, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: well, there haven't been any official Debian backports of LTSP, but i've generally managed to maintain backports for the current Debian stable release for most of, if not the whole cycle of of stable releases. And HUGELY appreciated it is,

[Ltsp-discuss] ltsp backports

2009-04-29 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 02:05:50PM -0500, Scott Balneaves wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:21:55PM -0400, Dan Maranville wrote: I'm really unsure as to why Ubuntu gets all this hate directed against them because they don't backport new features from more current releases into older ones. As

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp backports

2009-04-29 Thread Jordan Erickson
Vagrant Cascadian wrote: *snip* so the desires or needs for a backport may be a little different, as different distros progress in different ways. And most definitely they are different as user/environment upgrade schedules are always different. For instance, I don't dare run Jaunty (or

[Ltsp-discuss] ltsp backports

2009-03-10 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:01:32PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote: I also am interested in not upgrading my distro for as long as possible, while keeping up-to-date on LTSP. Is there any reason that it might be easier on Debian than Ubuntu? (or vice-versa) well, as one of the active LTSP maintainers