Sorry that’s an old message I sent before I subscribed the lttng-dev
mailing list.
Please ignore.
--
Paul
On 04/24/2012 11:20 AM, Woegerer, Paul wrote:
Is there some way to make the userspace application block if the
buffer is full ?
I'm thinking about something like:
lttng enable-channel
Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
There's a feature on the wishlist to use GCC hooks to automatically
generate those probes [1]. The end result would be the same, but it
would be much less tedious to do the instrumentation part. A Clang
plugin was also mentioned previously [2], but I don't think
* Oestman, Fredrik (fredrik_oest...@mentor.com) wrote:
Alexandre Montplaisir wrote:
There's a feature on the wishlist to use GCC hooks to automatically
generate those probes [1]. The end result would be the same, but it
would be much less tedious to do the instrumentation part. A Clang
* Lai Jiangshan (la...@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
found by clang(make CC=clang).
avoid empty statement.
-
if (condition)
dbg_printf() /* forget ;, but compiler say nothing if dbg_printf()
is empty */
statement;
merged, thanks!
Mathieu
Hi,
I just found a race in the replace vs del operations in rculfhash. This
would be introduced by commit:
commit db00ccc36e7fb04ce8044fb1be7964acd1de6ae0
Author: Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com
Date: Mon Dec 19 16:45:51 2011 -0500
rculfhash: Relax atomicity guarantees
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 02:22:12PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
[...]
Just to make sure I understand -- the reason that the del functions
say no memory barrier instead of acts
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:53:12PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
[...]
Just to make sure I understand -- the reason that the del functions
say no memory barrier instead of acts like rcu_dereference() is
that the del functions don't
RFC - LTTng Network Session and Snapshot
Author: David Goulet david.gou...@efficios.com
Contributors:
* Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com
* Julien Desfossez julien.desfos...@efficios.com
Version:
- v0.1: 16/04/2012
* Initial proposal
- v0.2: 04/05/2012
On 2012-05-05 12:10, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Rapha?l Beamonte (raphael.beamo...@polymtl.ca) wrote:
Hi Pavan,
Hi ,
I want to use LTTng on ARM processor running *Linux 2.6.33 kernel with
real-time patches, **My quires are** *
whether there’s an LTTng port which is compatible with
* Yannick Brosseau (yannick.bross...@polymtl.ca) wrote:
On 2012-05-05 12:10, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Rapha?l Beamonte (raphael.beamo...@polymtl.ca) wrote:
Hi Pavan,
Hi ,
I want to use LTTng on ARM processor running *Linux 2.6.33 kernel with
real-time patches, **My quires
* Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com) wrote:
Hi,
I just found a race in the replace vs del operations in rculfhash. This
would be introduced by commit:
Just to show that I am not making this up, I came up with a test-case to
reproduce it:
test_urcu_hash 0 2 20 -A -s -M 1 -N 1
11 matches
Mail list logo
