> new "urcu_ref_get_safe()" or such would be a better option ?
>
> After some thinking, I will go for adding a new urcu_ref_get_safe() API,
> thus not requiring to bump the library major version.
You may want to add a deprecated __attribute__ to the unsafe version in
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 02:32:28PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 07:16:37PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 05:57:33PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 02:08:22PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 01
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 03:26:19PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 01:42:10PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 02:32:28PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 07:16:37PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 05:57
struct foo *noident
test.c:25:9:got struct foo [noderef] asn:1*badsrc
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 4b14bdc
space *)(v); \
False positive; checkpatch.pl seems to parse this as multiplication
rather than a cast.
- Josh Triplett
___
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
of bar (because typeof propagated noderef).
- Josh Triplett
___
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 09:07:33AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 10:13:55PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 05:59:11PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
This commit ensures that all read-side functions meet the 10-line LGPL
criterion that permits
for this can't happen cases, and assert also
generates a signal that the application can catch and clean up.
- Josh Triplett
___
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 03:03:06PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Josh Triplett (j...@joshtriplett.org) wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:41:13PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
Currently, liburcu calls exit(-1) upon internal consistency error.
This is not pretty, and usually frowned
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 03:48:38PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Josh Triplett (j...@joshtriplett.org) wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 03:03:06PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Josh Triplett (j...@joshtriplett.org) wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:41:13PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers
assuming a
return value from rcu_assign_pointer. I'd recommend making it void.
- Josh Triplett
___
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
11 matches
Mail list logo