Re: [lttng-dev] Xeon Phi memory barriers

2013-12-06 Thread Simon Marchi
ping. On 19 November 2013 10:26, Simon Marchi simon.mar...@polymtl.ca wrote: Hello there, liburcu does not build on the Intel Xeon Phi, because the chip is recognized as x86_64, but lacks the {s,l,m}fence instructions found on usual x86_64 processors. The following is taken from the Xeon Phi

Re: [lttng-dev] Xeon Phi memory barriers

2013-12-06 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
- Original Message - From: Simon Marchi simon.mar...@polymtl.ca To: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 4:26:06 PM Subject: [lttng-dev] Xeon Phi memory barriers Hello there, Hi Simon, While reading this reply, please keep in mind that I'm in a mindset where

Re: [lttng-dev] Xeon Phi memory barriers

2013-12-06 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 08:15:38PM +, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: - Original Message - From: Simon Marchi simon.mar...@polymtl.ca To: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 4:26:06 PM Subject: [lttng-dev] Xeon Phi memory barriers Hello there, Hi Simon,

Re: [lttng-dev] Xeon Phi memory barriers

2013-12-06 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
- Original Message - From: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com Cc: Simon Marchi simon.mar...@polymtl.ca, lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org Sent: Friday, December 6, 2013 10:40:45 PM Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] Xeon Phi memory barriers