* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:13:30PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
[...]
A write barrier would be sufficient in the case where there were only
two threads observing each
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:53:12PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:13:30PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
[...]
A write barrier would be
On 12-05-05 12:14 AM, Loris Degioanni wrote:
I just installed the lttng package on a fresh Ubuntu 12 machine, and
I'm following the tutorial at http://lttng.org/quickstart.
The enable-event step fails with this error:
# lttng enable-event sched_switch,sys_open -k
kernel event sched_switch
Hi,
On 05/05/12 12:14 AM, Loris Degioanni wrote:
I just installed the lttng package on a fresh Ubuntu 12 machine, and I'm
following the tutorial at http://lttng.org/quickstart.
The enable-event step fails with this error:
# lttng enable-event sched_switch,sys_open -k
kernel event
On 12-05-05 12:42 AM, Julien Desfossez wrote:
Hi,
On 05/05/12 12:14 AM, Loris Degioanni wrote:
I just installed the lttng package on a fresh Ubuntu 12 machine, and I'm
following the tutorial at http://lttng.org/quickstart.
The enable-event step fails with this error:
# lttng enable-event
Is there some way to make the userspace application block if the buffer
is full ?
I'm thinking about something like:
lttng enable-channel myblockingchannel --block
I know I can increase the subbuf-size but sometimes this is not an
option (embedded targets with less RAM).
--block would be a
Hi ,
I want to use LTTng on ARM processor running Linux 2.6.33 kernel with
real-time patches, My quires are
whether there's an LTTng port which is compatible with an RT patched Kernel,
If not what's required to make it RT Patch compatible. Please kindly help me on
this.
Thanks In Advance,
First of all, that worked. Thank you.
So let's suppose I only want to track a handful of system calls, what's
the most efficient way to filter out everything else?
Loris
On 5/4/2012 9:42 PM, Julien Desfossez wrote:
Hi,
On 05/05/12 12:14 AM, Loris Degioanni wrote:
I just installed the
Hi Pavan,
Hi ,
I want to use LTTng on ARM processor running *Linux 2.6.33 kernel with
real-time patches, **My quires are** *
whether there’s an LTTng port which is compatible with an RT patched
Kernel, If not what’s required to make it RT Patch compatible. Please
kindly help me on this.
First of all, that worked. Thank you.
So let's suppose I only want to track a handful of system calls, what's
the most efficient way to filter out everything else?
You can't filter at the source for now, you need to trace all system
calls, so your filtering will be done at analysis time.
If
10 matches
Mail list logo