Re: [lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH CTF 1/3] Clarify that unlisted enum values are implementation-defined

- Original Message - > From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" > To: "gbastien+lttng" , "Matthew Khouzam" > , > diamon-disc...@linuxfoundation.org, ppro...@efficios.com, "Jeremie Galarneau" > > Cc: "lttng-dev" , "Mathieu Desnoyers" > > Sent: Thursday, 23 April, 2020 16:52:24 > Subject: [RFC PATCH C

Re: [lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin

- Original Message - > From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" > To: "gbastien+lttng" , "Matthew Khouzam" > , > diamon-disc...@linuxfoundation.org, ppro...@efficios.com, "Jeremie Galarneau" > > Cc: "lttng-dev" , "Mathieu Desnoyers" > > Sent: Thursday, 23 April, 2020 16:52:25 > Subject: [RFC PATCH C

Re: [lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH CTF 1/3] Clarify that unlisted enum values are implementation-defined

- On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:40 PM, Philippe Proulx ppro...@efficios.com wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" >> To: "gbastien+lttng" , "Matthew Khouzam" >> , >> diamon-disc...@linuxfoundation.org, ppro...@efficios.com, "Jeremie Galarneau" >> >> Cc: "lttng-dev" , "Ma

Re: [lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin

- On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:42 PM, Philippe Proulx ppro...@efficios.com wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" >> To: "gbastien+lttng" , "Matthew Khouzam" >> , >> diamon-disc...@linuxfoundation.org, ppro...@efficios.com, "Jeremie Galarneau" >> >> Cc: "lttng-dev" , "Ma

[lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH CTF 1/4] Clarify that unlisted enumeration values are allowed

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers --- common-trace-format-specification.md | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/common-trace-format-specification.md b/common-trace-format-specification.md index fd49e59..d6d196c 100644 --- a/common-trace-format-specification.md +++ b/common-trace

[lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH CTF 3/4] Clarify that timestamp begin/end need to be complete clock values

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers --- common-trace-format-specification.md | 18 ++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/common-trace-format-specification.md b/common-trace-format-specification.md index 55d0601..5732e92 100644 --- a/common-trace-format-sp

[lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH CTF 4/4] Use the formulation "less than or equal to" rather than "below or equal"

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers --- common-trace-format-specification.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/common-trace-format-specification.md b/common-trace-format-specification.md index 5732e92..8a3a745 100644 --- a/common-trace-format-specification.md

[lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH CTF 2/4] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers --- common-trace-format-specification.md | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/common-trace-format-specification.md b/common-trace-format-specification.md index d6d196c..55d0601 100644 --- a/common-trace-format-specificati