Re: [lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] simpletrace : support var num of args and strings.

2012-01-09 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Harsh Bora (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: > On 01/10/2012 05:44 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> * Harsh Bora (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: >>> On 01/09/2012 09:31 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: * Harsh Prateek Bora (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: > Existing simple trace can log up

Re: [lttng-dev] Compilation error while building ust 1.9.4

2012-01-09 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Harsh Bora (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: > On 01/10/2012 01:47 AM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote: >> On 12-01-09 02:39 PM, Harsh Bora wrote: >>> Hi, >>> While building LTTng ust 1.9.4 with urcu 0.6.6, I get following >>> compilation errors: >> >> Hi, >> Did you try with the latest URCU (0.6.7)

Re: [lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] simpletrace : support var num of args and strings.

2012-01-09 Thread Harsh Bora
On 01/10/2012 05:44 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: * Harsh Bora (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: On 01/09/2012 09:31 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: * Harsh Prateek Bora (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: Existing simple trace can log upto 6 args per trace event and does not support strings in trac

Re: [lttng-dev] Compilation error while building ust 1.9.4

2012-01-09 Thread Harsh Bora
On 01/10/2012 01:47 AM, Alexandre Montplaisir wrote: On 12-01-09 02:39 PM, Harsh Bora wrote: Hi, While building LTTng ust 1.9.4 with urcu 0.6.6, I get following compilation errors: Hi, Did you try with the latest URCU (0.6.7) ? I cannot reproduce the problem here with UST 1.9.4 and URCU git h

Re: [lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] simpletrace : support var num of args and strings.

2012-01-09 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Harsh Bora (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: > On 01/09/2012 09:31 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> * Harsh Prateek Bora (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: >>> Existing simple trace can log upto 6 args per trace event and does not >>> support strings in trace record format. Introducing new trace fo

Re: [lttng-dev] [URCU PATCH] Fix autoconf futex check

2012-01-09 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* David Goulet (dgou...@efficios.com) wrote: > The check was always returning true. > > Signed-off-by: David Goulet Merged, thanks! Mathieu > --- > configure.ac |5 ++--- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index 46770c5..f18d

[lttng-dev] Running under Fedora 12

2012-01-09 Thread Miceli, Carlo J.
Has anyone run lttng under fedora core 12 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.i686 Have trouble trying to figure out what to download for this kernel. Can anyone help here ? Thanks, Carlo ___ lttng-dev mailing list lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org http://lists.lttn

[lttng-dev] [URCU PATCH] Fix autoconf futex check

2012-01-09 Thread David Goulet
The check was always returning true. Signed-off-by: David Goulet --- configure.ac |5 ++--- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 46770c5..f18d95b 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -102,13 +102,12 @@ AS_IF([test "x$ARCH

Re: [lttng-dev] background information about LTTng timestamps

2012-01-09 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Sébastien Barthélémy (barthel...@crans.org) wrote: > Hello all, Already fixed this morning by commit: commit 9080554ff25b08f48762d2ee7cfa3981317e9c1d Author: Mathieu Desnoyers Date: Mon Jan 9 11:42:57 2012 -0500 Fix timestamps for slow-paced event rates Given that we currently

[lttng-dev] background information about LTTng timestamps

2012-01-09 Thread Sébastien Barthélémy
Hello all, I'm using LTTng 2 (only UST for now) to study the behaviour of a realtime multiprocess application. Some of the traces I get suggest the synchronization between the processes is not working as expected. However this might ascome from latencies or even hops in LTTng clock source. (Or ma

Re: [lttng-dev] Compilation error while building ust 1.9.4

2012-01-09 Thread Alexandre Montplaisir
On 12-01-09 02:39 PM, Harsh Bora wrote: > Hi, > While building LTTng ust 1.9.4 with urcu 0.6.6, I get following > compilation errors: Hi, Did you try with the latest URCU (0.6.7) ? I cannot reproduce the problem here with UST 1.9.4 and URCU git head. Alex > > CC lttng-probe-ust.lo > CC

Re: [lttng-dev] lttng create freezes sometimes

2012-01-09 Thread David Goulet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Sébastien, Well, I can't recreate this problem on my side... Looking at the log you posted, you got a successful create and after a failure or... ? It seems that the command never reached the session daemon... and this is *really* weird and almost

[lttng-dev] Compilation error while building ust 1.9.4

2012-01-09 Thread Harsh Bora
Hi, While building LTTng ust 1.9.4 with urcu 0.6.6, I get following compilation errors: CC lttng-probe-ust.lo CC lttng-context-vtid.lo CC lttng-context-vpid.lo CC lttng-context-pthread-id.lo CC lttng-context-procname.lo In file included from ../include/lttng/ust-ev

Re: [lttng-dev] [lttng-tools PATCH] lttng-sessiond: do not call ustctl_register_done()

2012-01-09 Thread David Goulet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I changed a typo in the patch: ust_ctl_register_done --> ustctl_register_done and added your signed off: - --> Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto Merged and pushed! Thanks a lot David On 12-01-05 06:25 AM, Gerlando Falauto wrote: > When lttng-ust s

Re: [lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] simpletrace : support var num of args and strings.

2012-01-09 Thread Harsh Bora
On 01/09/2012 09:31 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: * Harsh Prateek Bora (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: Existing simple trace can log upto 6 args per trace event and does not support strings in trace record format. Introducing new trace format as discussed earlier on list to support variable num

Re: [lttng-dev] lttng create --help spawns a daemon

2012-01-09 Thread David Goulet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Sébastion, Yes, any --help with a "second level" command will trigger a session daemon exec... It's a known """problem""". The stable release will fix that for sure. Thanks for the report! David On 12-01-05 06:05 AM, Sébastien Barthélémy wrote:

Re: [lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] simpletrace : support var num of args and strings.

2012-01-09 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Harsh Prateek Bora (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: > Existing simple trace can log upto 6 args per trace event and does not > support strings in trace record format. Introducing new trace format as > discussed earlier on list to support variable number/size of arguments. > (Ref: http://lists.gn