Re: [lttng-dev] (no subject)

2019-06-12 Thread Philippe Proulx
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:22 PM Zvi Vered wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm trying to read the file "metadata". > I read the struct: > > struct metadata_packet_header { > uint32_t magic; /* 0x75D11D57 */ > uint8_t uuid[16]; /* Unique Universal Identifier */ > uint32_t checksum; /* 0 if unused */ >

[lttng-dev] (no subject)

2019-06-12 Thread Zvi Vered
Hello, I'm trying to read the file "metadata". I read the struct: struct metadata_packet_header { uint32_t magic; /* 0x75D11D57 */ uint8_t uuid[16]; /* Unique Universal Identifier */ uint32_t checksum; /* 0 if unused */ uint32_t content_size; /* in bits */ uint32_t packet_size; /* in bits */

Re: [lttng-dev] [OE-core] [PATCH v2] lttng-modules: Backport patches to fix compilation failures since kernel v5.1

2019-06-12 Thread He Zhe
On 6/12/19 7:29 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > - On Jun 12, 2019, at 1:10 PM, zhe he zhe...@windriver.com wrote: > >> On 6/12/19 6:58 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >>> - On Jun 12, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Adrian Bunk b...@stusta.de wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:49:34PM +0100,

Re: [lttng-dev] [OE-core] [PATCH v2] lttng-modules: Backport patches to fix compilation failures since kernel v5.1

2019-06-12 Thread Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:52:36AM -0400, Jonathan Rajotte-Julien wrote: > Hi, > > > > Please don't base distributions on -rc tags. They are not meant for this. > > > > > > We always integrate support for newer kernel versions instrumentation back > > > into our current stable release. So as soon

Re: [lttng-dev] [OE-core] [PATCH v2] lttng-modules: Backport patches to fix compilation failures since kernel v5.1

2019-06-12 Thread Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
Hi, > > Please don't base distributions on -rc tags. They are not meant for this. > > > > We always integrate support for newer kernel versions instrumentation back > > into our current stable release. So as soon as 5.2 final comes out, we will > > release a 2.10.x version including support for

Re: [lttng-dev] [OE-core] [PATCH v2] lttng-modules: Backport patches to fix compilation failures since kernel v5.1

2019-06-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 06:58:22AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >... > We always integrate support for newer kernel versions instrumentation back > into our current stable release. So as soon as 5.2 final comes out, we will > release a 2.10.x version including support for it in lttng-modules.

Re: [lttng-dev] [OE-core] [PATCH v2] lttng-modules: Backport patches to fix compilation failures since kernel v5.1

2019-06-12 Thread He Zhe
On 6/12/19 6:58 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > - On Jun 12, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Adrian Bunk b...@stusta.de wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:49:34PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 17:03 +0800, zhe...@windriver.com wrote: From: He Zhe For the

Re: [lttng-dev] [OE-core] [PATCH v2] lttng-modules: Backport patches to fix compilation failures since kernel v5.1

2019-06-12 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
- On Jun 12, 2019, at 3:27 PM, Adrian Bunk b...@stusta.de wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 06:58:22AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >>... >> We always integrate support for newer kernel versions instrumentation back >> into our current stable release. So as soon as 5.2 final comes out, we

Re: [lttng-dev] [OE-core] [PATCH v2] lttng-modules: Backport patches to fix compilation failures since kernel v5.1

2019-06-12 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
- On Jun 12, 2019, at 1:10 PM, zhe he zhe...@windriver.com wrote: > On 6/12/19 6:58 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> - On Jun 12, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Adrian Bunk b...@stusta.de wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:49:34PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 17:03

Re: [lttng-dev] [OE-core] [PATCH v2] lttng-modules: Backport patches to fix compilation failures since kernel v5.1

2019-06-12 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
- On Jun 12, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Adrian Bunk b...@stusta.de wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:49:34PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 17:03 +0800, zhe...@windriver.com wrote: >> > From: He Zhe >> > >> > For the moment, >> > 0001~0004 are on master branch only. >> >