* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:48:27PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:10:55PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:10:55PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:53:12PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
[...]
Just to make sure I understand -- the reason that the del functions
say no memory barrier
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:10:55PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:53:12PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
[...]
Just to make sure I understand --
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:48:27PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:10:55PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:53:12PM
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 02:22:12PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
[...]
Just to make sure I understand -- the reason that the del functions
say no memory barrier instead of acts
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:53:12PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
[...]
Just to make sure I understand -- the reason that the del functions
say no memory barrier instead of acts like rcu_dereference() is
that the del functions don't
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:53:12PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:13:30PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:13:30PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
[...]
A write barrier would be sufficient in the case where there were only
two threads observing each
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:53:12PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:13:30PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
[...]
A write barrier would be
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:16:39AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 05:02:06PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:13:30PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:16:39AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 05:02:06PM -0400,
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:16:39AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 05:02:06PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 01:41:36PM -0400,
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 11:12:15AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:16:09AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
Hi!
After 1 year of development, with the last 6-7 months spent polishing
the API and testing
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 11:21:44AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com) wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:16:09AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
Hi!
After 1 year of
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 01:41:36PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 11:21:44AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com) wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 01:41:36PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 11:21:44AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Mathieu Desnoyers
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 05:02:06PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 01:41:36PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 11:21:44AM -0400,
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 05:02:06PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney (paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 01:41:36PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney
18 matches
Mail list logo