Re: [lttng-dev] babeltrace tests (master/2.0)

2017-09-18 Thread Nathan Lynch
Philippe Proulx writes: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Nathan Lynch wrote: >> Nathan Lynch writes: >>> Philippe Proulx writes: I asked the Automake mailing list about this

Re: [lttng-dev] babeltrace tests (master/2.0)

2017-09-15 Thread Nathan Lynch
Nathan Lynch writes: > Philippe Proulx writes: >> >> I asked the Automake mailing list about this >> and >> we will most probably implement the suggested solution, which is to

Re: [lttng-dev] babeltrace tests (master/2.0)

2017-09-15 Thread Philippe Proulx
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Nathan Lynch wrote: > Nathan Lynch writes: >> Philippe Proulx writes: >>> >>> I asked the Automake mailing list about this >>>

Re: [lttng-dev] babeltrace tests (master/2.0)

2017-08-11 Thread Nathan Lynch
Philippe Proulx writes: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Nathan Lynch wrote: >> >> Ping? >> > > Sorry. We looked into this. There seems to be no easy way with Automake > to have individual `check` targets in subdirectories and make the >

Re: [lttng-dev] babeltrace tests (master/2.0)

2017-08-10 Thread Philippe Proulx
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Nathan Lynch wrote: > > Ping? > Sorry. We looked into this. There seems to be no easy way with Automake to have individual `check` targets in subdirectories and make the top-level `check` target recurse without stopping when a

Re: [lttng-dev] babeltrace tests (master/2.0)

2017-08-10 Thread Nathan Lynch
Ping? Nathan Lynch writes: > How is the babeltrace test suite on the master and stable-2.0 branches > intended to be used? > > Effectively there are four test suites, one for each definition of TESTS > in the tests/ directory. If one of them has a failure, 'make