[luatex] Problems using node.setglue (r6317)

2017-04-20 Thread Deepak Jois
I just compiled the latest LuaTeX at r6317 and some code that worked earlier doesn’t anymore. This fails with error message (font_params is defined earlier): "glue (spec) expected" n = node.new("glue", 13) node.setglue(n, font_params.space, font_params.space_stretch, font_params.space_

Re: [luatex] status.shell_escape broken in texlive 2017

2017-04-20 Thread Robert Alessi
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:19:19PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live-commits/2017-April/002631.html > > Thanks. The mirror I'm using is at 43913, so I'm almost there. I'll wait > a few hours and try again. > > Scott I just got 43919 from mirror.hmc.edu, but

Re: [luatex] Linking to C libraries / TL2017 / FFI

2017-04-20 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hello all, thanks Hans, Michal and Luigi for the responses. I'll try it out and put my results on the wiki. Patrick

Re: [luatex] Linking to C libraries / TL2017 / FFI

2017-04-20 Thread Dirk Laurie
2017-04-19 21:04 GMT+02:00 luigi scarso : > luatex 1.0.4 has a ffi module which aims to be compatible with luajit ffi as > in > http://luajit.org/ext_ffi.html > so, if you have a C so/dll you can load it in luatex, but you have > also to provide an "interface " > (see, for example Accessing the

Re: [luatex] status.shell_escape broken in texlive 2017

2017-04-20 Thread David Carlisle
The sources are updated but not all the binaries are updated yet (depends on volunteers compiling on each of the platforms) so if you are not compiling from source but using the binaries from the tl2017 pretest the fix will appear at different times, depending what platform you are using, could be

Re: [luatex] Linking to C libraries / TL2017 / FFI

2017-04-20 Thread luigi scarso
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Dirk Laurie wrote: > Was this developed by the luatex team? If not, where is upstream? almost 1:1 copy from https://github.com/facebook/luaffifb -- luigi

Re: [luatex] status.shell_escape broken in texlive 2017

2017-04-20 Thread Robert Alessi
Many thanks, I was not aware of that. As this is fixed, and no further testing is required, I think I'll just wait for the updated binaries to arrive (32-bit Linux in my case). Robert On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:50:14AM +0100, David Carlisle wrote: > The sources are updated but not all the binari

Re: [luatex] Linking to C libraries / TL2017 / FFI

2017-04-20 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi all, the first report for Mac: The attempt to link sqlite3 library from the Kepler project fails on MacOS X. Same problem as in http://tracker.luatex.org/view.php?id=555. Patrick

Re: [luatex] Linking to C libraries / TL2017 / FFI

2017-04-20 Thread luigi scarso
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Patrick Gundlach wrote: > Hi all, > > the first report for Mac: > > The attempt to link sqlite3 library from the Kepler project fails on MacOS X. > Same problem as in http://tracker.luatex.org/view.php?id=555. > > Patrick > > did you compiled the binary by yoursel

Re: [luatex] Linking to C libraries / TL2017 / FFI

2017-04-20 Thread Patrick Gundlach
> did you compiled the binary by yourself ? no, it is the one from tl2017 Patrick

Re: [luatex] status.shell_escape broken in texlive 2017

2017-04-20 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:23:25PM +0200, Robert Alessi wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:50:14AM +0100, David Carlisle wrote: > > The sources are updated but not all the binaries are updated yet (depends > > on volunteers compiling on each of the platforms) so if you are not > > compiling from s

Re: [luatex] status.shell_escape broken in texlive 2017

2017-04-20 Thread David Carlisle
On 20 April 2017 at 16:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:23:25PM +0200, Robert Alessi wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:50:14AM +0100, David Carlisle wrote: > > > The sources are updated but not all the binaries are updated yet > (depends > > > on volunteers compiling on

Re: [luatex] status.shell_escape broken in texlive 2017

2017-04-20 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:33:12PM +0100, David Carlisle wrote: > On 20 April 2017 at 16:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Indeed, good to know, David. Is there a way (e.g. a URL) to check when > > this happens? I'm more curious about this in general, not for this > > specific issue. > > > > well f