Go to rpmfind.net and do a look up for whatever package you see as a
dependency and they'll show you a list form where you choose your flavor
and version of linux
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 9:
Can someone tell me what packages I need that contains libgcc_s.so.1 and
libpng12.so.1 packages? Also, where can I get them at? I have Suse 8.0
(retail) and looked through the entire list of packages and neither of these
are there.
Well, I don t use SuSE, but on my redhat box they are in
Aloha Everyone!
Only on the list for two days and already needing helphehehe
I am trying to install a package but it is calling for some shared object
package dependencies that I can't find.
Can someone tell me what packages I need that contains libgcc_s.so.1 and
libpng12.so.1 packages? A
Jimen Ching wrote:
I guess you mean this Power3 processor, which is a 64bit processor.
I curious as to what kind of applications you have that need a 64bit
processor.
--jc
Well, personally I have nothing that requires 64bit, just having Athlon
64 would allow me to run existing 32bit programs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
slughead writes "Forbes Magazine is reporting that AMD will no longer
compete with Intel to make faster, smaller, and more efficient
processors. Just as Mac users would be worse off if Windows didn't
exist, Intel users will be much worse now that AMD will no longer
com
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Vince Hoang wrote:
>I was replying off of Wayne's description of transparency, which I
>translated as reducing the gotchas in moving away from a windows world.
This is a valid definition. There are many projects that sees this as
their main goal, i.e. KDE.
>I personally thin
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Warren Togami wrote:
>Didn't IBM have something that is the "next generation" of PowerPC, but
>it is currently too expensive for Apple to use mainstream?
I guess you mean this Power3 processor, which is a 64bit processor.
I curious as to what kind of applications you have tha
-snip from /.
Posted by timothy on Sunday November 24, @01:53AM
slughead writes "Forbes Magazine is reporting that AMD will no longer
compete with Intel to make faster, smaller, and more efficient
processors. Just as Mac users would be worse off if Windows didn't
exist, Intel users will b
Eric Jeschke wrote:
I don't agree with this. They are tracking the top of the PPC
manufacturing pretty closely. Witness: the dual 1GHz G4 is their
current top of the line (they have been beating Motorola's door down
trying to get them to build a faster chip, but Motorola does not have
the mark
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 Jimen Ching wrote:
| Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 22:59:48 -1000 (HST)
| From: Jimen Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| [snip]...
| I heard the opposite. I heard the higher clock rates of the Pentium
| 4's give you no advantages. I heard clock rates of 800Mhz is
LinuxDan wrote:
Warren
So you still have that Laptop or did you take it back? I
guess the only alternative is to use XP??!
Dan
Luckily I didn't buy one for myself. The one I was testing was for my
Windows-using friend for college.
I'm personally waiting for the Athlon lap
Warren
So you still have that Laptop or did you take it back? I
guess the only alternative is to use XP??!
Dan
LinuxDan wrote:
> Warren
> Did you finally get that Compaq Laptop to work?
>
> Dan
>
Do you mean the Compaq Presario 900 series? It turned out
LinuxDan wrote:
Warren
Did you finally get that Compaq Laptop to work?
Dan
Do you mean the Compaq Presario 900 series? It turned out that the
chipset is brand new and undocumented, so it caused tons of problems
with various Linux components. This turned into one
Warren
Did you finally get that Compaq Laptop to work?
Dan
Scott
If I were able to walk, I would have helped you in both staging
and deployment. Unfortunately I have a fracture that wont be healed enough
to walk until March.
I also like your ideas on the LUAU.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] B
Randall
The MLB D845PEBT2 also has onboard RAID.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Randall Oshita
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 1:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [luau] Hyper technology
LinuxDan,
Whats the exact
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 11:30:36PM -1000, Jimen Ching wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Vince Hoang wrote:
> >users were educated to invest in a firewall, they would get
> >increased security _and_ transparency.
>
> May I also ask how setting the hostname could decrease
> security and/or transparency?
It is going to be difficult for me to do the buildfest today at the stadium
marketplace pricebusters today. If you have an insatiable desire to go there
today to do something, please call me at 306-5519. We can probably work
something out.
scott
LinuxDan,
Whats the exact model on that board? And chipset?
Tryong to look for it on Intel's site.
Thanks
Randall
Jimen
I am using the Intel 2.53 CPU and MLB that uses
hyperthreading
on triple boot system running RH8, W2K and XP.
Actually RH8 utilizes it better than MS. I have 200% i
http://phoebe.mplug.org
I made this apt repository of Phoebe for myself in order to speed up my
K12LTSP testing, but everyone is free to use it if you wish. Please let
me know if you wish to mirror this repository, I will give you rsync access.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.c
20 matches
Mail list logo
