Jim Thompson wrote:
Angela Kahealani wrote:

On Tue, 2005-05-17 13:58, Jim Thompson wrote:
Linux was developed by Finnish computer scientist Linus Torvalds
based on the Unix operating system.


No, the vast majority of the GNU system was developed by Richard Stallman and company, and Linus only delivered a kernel to replace the behind schedule Hurd kernel PORTION of the GNU free replacement of UNIX.
The statement "linux was developed by Linus" isn't even true. Oh sure, he leads the effort,
but there are a lot of people involved.

BTW, I was *quoting*. I know all about (and mostly agree with rms on) the politics of "GNU/linux" .vs "linux", and have even argued that "TPOSSCON" should be "TPFOSSCON" (Trans Pacific Free & Open Source Software CONference), pronounced Tee-Foz-Con. :-)

Cuba & linux:
http://www.linux.cu/

But back to the story. I think this transition will start happening more and more, especially in the (so called) third world. Microsoft no longer loves its users:

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2005/jan05/01-26GenuineAdvantagePR.asp http://www.betanews.com/article/The_Truth_About_Windows_Genuine_Advantage/1116005058 http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/windows/story/0,10801,100756,00.html

And don't forget the new Microsoft "licensing model", where you almost literally "rent" Windows: http://www.directionsonmicrosoft.com/sample/DOMIS/update/2004/04apr/0404saacd.htm

Or the pain (and expense) of "staying legal" when running Microsoft products: http://www.sensiblesoftware.com/articles/a/Microsoft-s-Licensing-Model-sigh.html

Back when I was in the corporate world, I used to *love* getting some pro-Microsoft CFO/CEO to public commit to purchasing all the licenses required for "compliance", and then submitting the paperwork showing how much it was going to cost. Man, do they do the "OMG"/"this can't be true" dance.

Microsoft is the ultimate virus. For years they've allowed themselves to infect the world with buggy, dangerous products. Now that they're *literally* everywhere, they want you to pay (and keep paying) for them to fix their broken stuff.

Likely they would have executed the master plan by now, except for linux, and FOSS.

Jim
(who still thinks that freebsd is better for some things.)
_______________________________________________
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luau



FreeBSD ROCKS!!!


Al Plant

 -- Webmaster- http://hawaiidakine.com Admin- http://freebsdinfo.org --
Supporting Open Source Computing - - FreeBSD 4.11/5.3/6.0 -- Debian Linux 3*
"All that's really worth doing is what we do for others."- Lewis Carroll

Reply via email to