On Mar 24, 2006, at 3:58 PM, Hawaii Linux Institute wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
"Mighty Blue" got knocked down via their Consent Decree,
"Consent Decree"? What consent decree? (I think you have mixed up
the IBM case with AT&T, Jim.) In the antitrust case against IBM,
DOJ was clobbered
Jim Thompson wrote:
"Mighty Blue" got knocked down via their Consent Decree,
"Consent Decree"? What consent decree? (I think you have mixed up the
IBM case with AT&T, Jim.) In the antitrust case against IBM, DOJ was
clobbered by David Boies, the lead attorney for IBM--the gov dropped the
On Mar 24, 2006, at 1:07 PM, Hawaii Linux Institute wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
Interrupt routing isn't that difficult, until you have to deal
with all the legacy IRQ crap from the days of ISA/EISA buses.
then its insane.
So, PowerPC, MIPS, ARM, SPARC and x86 sans support for ISA are all
Dave Burns wrote:
On 3/24/06, Julian Yap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I missed the announcement, and it's not on the HOSEF calendar.
What/where/who/when?
The HOSEF calendar is for anyone to submit an event to.
So if I knew when where and what this event will be, I'd put it in the
calendar.
Jim Thompson wrote:
Interrupt routing isn't that difficult, until you have to deal with
all the legacy IRQ crap from the days of ISA/EISA buses.
then its insane.
So, PowerPC, MIPS, ARM, SPARC and x86 sans support for ISA are all
equivalent in terms of low-weirdness during install of a new c
On Mar 24, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Hawaii Linux Institute wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Mar 24, 2006, at 10:31 AM, Matt Darnell wrote:
I would not purchase a telephony card. Too many things can go
wrong with
IRQ's etc.
This is the fault of running on PC architectures, not the
telephony ca
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Mar 24, 2006, at 10:31 AM, Matt Darnell wrote:
I would not purchase a telephony card. Too many things can go wrong
with
IRQ's etc.
This is the fault of running on PC architectures, not the telephony
card per-se.
Both approaches are valid.
Jim
So you think SPARC w
On 3/24/06, Julian Yap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I missed the announcement, and it's not on the HOSEF calendar.
> > What/where/who/when?
> The HOSEF calendar is for anyone to submit an event to.
So if I knew when where and what this event will be, I'd put it in the
calendar.
But I have ba
On Mar 24, 2006, at 10:31 AM, Matt Darnell wrote:
I would not purchase a telephony card. Too many things can go
wrong with
IRQ's etc.
This is the fault of running on PC architectures, not the telephony
card per-se.
Both approaches are valid.
Jim
On 3/24/06, Dave Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ..is anyone
> > still up for the Asterisk build this weekend?
> >
>
> I missed the announcement, and it's not on the HOSEF calendar.
> What/where/who/when? Ah, now I found it, subject line was about MYTHTV, I
> had skipped it.
>
> I just g
On 3/24/06, Julian Yap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Dave Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ..is anyone
> > > still up for the Asterisk build this weekend?
> > >
> >
> > I missed the announcement, and it's not on the HOSEF calendar.
> > What/where/who/when? Ah, now I found it, subject
--- Dave Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ..is anyone
> > still up for the Asterisk build this weekend?
> >
>
> I missed the announcement, and it's not on the HOSEF calendar.
> What/where/who/when? Ah, now I found it, subject line was
> about MYTHTV, I
> had skipped it.
Both of these even
> ..is anyone
> still up for the Asterisk build this weekend?
>
I missed the announcement, and it's not on the HOSEF calendar.
What/where/who/when? Ah, now I found it, subject line was about MYTHTV, I
had skipped it.
I just got a copy of knoppsterisk I'd like to try out, but I don't have a
PB
On 2/28/06, Brian Chee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> given enough time to plan and if I'm not on travel...I'd be happy to host
> sessions at ANCL, especially if you folks want a network lab environment.
>
> Right now it's in a shambles after moving and it will take a while to get
> organizedbu
OTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 10:34 AM
Subject: [LUAU] more participation
> LUAU as a traditional LUG predates me. From what I can gather,
> HOSEF and old LUAU issues stemmed from personality issues and
> lots of empty promises. If we forget about what we "should&q
LUAU as a traditional LUG predates me. From what I can gather,
HOSEF and old LUAU issues stemmed from personality issues and
lots of empty promises. If we forget about what we "should" do
and focus on what we "will" do, then we can move past all the
past nonsense.
Julian is looking for presenters
16 matches
Mail list logo
