Re: [LUAU] list moderation

2008-03-31 Thread Vince Hoang
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Ronald Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Can you explain what's involved?  Are you referring to administration of
  the LUAU Mailman list on Dreamhost?

I am adding you now.

-Vince

PS. I am cleaning out some membership addresses that have mail
disabled due to bounced addresses.
___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org


Re: [LUAU] list moderation

2008-03-31 Thread Ronald Fox
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 09:18 -0700, Vince Hoang wrote:
 On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Ronald Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Can you explain what's involved?  Are you referring to administration of
   the LUAU Mailman list on Dreamhost?
 
 I am adding you now.

OK.  I'll take that as a yes.

 -Vince
 
 PS. I am cleaning out some membership addresses that have mail
 disabled due to bounced addresses.

Thanks,
Ron


___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org


Re: [LUAU] list moderation

2008-03-31 Thread Al Plant
Gary Sublett wrote:
 On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 07:05:12 -0700
 Vince Hoang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   
 You just don't get it. I am not turning on emergency moderation.
 Instead, I will remove both of you from LUAU until you settle your
 differences. I do not begrudge either of you. I think you both want
 what is best for HOSEF, but your strong personalities prevent you from
 finding common ground.

 You idea of containment does not work in the Internet age. I tried
 keeping this venue open in your defense. By closing off both
 hosef-managers and LUAU, the disagreement will spill elsewhere, and
 likely where you will not be able to retract the discussion.

 If any subscribers disagree, let me know.

 

 I disagree, the threat of removing a subscriber from the list based on
 what?  

 To protect someone from themself, seems rather paternalistic.

 To protect the integrity of the list or subject matter, seems
 inconsistant with the range of subjects or lack thereof over recent
 years.

 --
 Gary
 ___
 LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
 http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org

   
Ah Ha!

As always a  voice of reason. 

Glad you still lurk, Gary. 

~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii -  Phone:  808-284-2740
  + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + 
  + http://aloha50.net   - Supporting - FreeBSD 6.* - 7.* - 8.* +
   email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
All that's really worth doing is what we do for others.- Lewis Carrol


___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org


Re: [LUAU] list moderation

2008-03-30 Thread Vince Hoang
My moderation actions have been undone.

The archives are public. No posted have been redacted. The people I
removed from the list have asked not to be resubscribed but they are
free to rejoin.

Can someone else volunteer to take the helm now?

-Vince
___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org


Re: [LUAU] list moderation

2008-03-30 Thread Ronald Fox
On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 10:05 -0700, Vince Hoang wrote:
 My moderation actions have been undone.
 
 The archives are public. No posted have been redacted. The people I
 removed from the list have asked not to be resubscribed but they are
 free to rejoin.

Thank you Vince,

 Can someone else volunteer to take the helm now?

Can you explain what's involved?  Are you referring to administration of
the LUAU Mailman list on Dreamhost?

With warm regards,
Ron

 -Vince
 ___
 LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
 http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org

___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org


Re: [LUAU] list moderation

2008-03-29 Thread Vince Hoang
You just don't get it. I am not turning on emergency moderation.
Instead, I will remove both of you from LUAU until you settle your
differences. I do not begrudge either of you. I think you both want
what is best for HOSEF, but your strong personalities prevent you from
finding common ground.

You idea of containment does not work in the Internet age. I tried
keeping this venue open in your defense. By closing off both
hosef-managers and LUAU, the disagreement will spill elsewhere, and
likely where you will not be able to retract the discussion.

If any subscribers disagree, let me know.

-Vince
___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org


Re: [LUAU] list moderation

2008-03-29 Thread Michael Bishop
+1, I agree.

- Vince Hoang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 You just don't get it. I am not turning on emergency moderation.
 Instead, I will remove both of you from LUAU until you settle your
 differences. I do not begrudge either of you. I think you both want
 what is best for HOSEF, but your strong personalities prevent you
 from
 finding common ground.
 
 You idea of containment does not work in the Internet age. I tried
 keeping this venue open in your defense. By closing off both
 hosef-managers and LUAU, the disagreement will spill elsewhere, and
 likely where you will not be able to retract the discussion.
 
 If any subscribers disagree, let me know.
 
 -Vince
 ___
 LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
 http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org
___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org


Re: [LUAU] list moderation

2008-03-29 Thread Gary Sublett
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 07:05:12 -0700
Vince Hoang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 You just don't get it. I am not turning on emergency moderation.
 Instead, I will remove both of you from LUAU until you settle your
 differences. I do not begrudge either of you. I think you both want
 what is best for HOSEF, but your strong personalities prevent you from
 finding common ground.
 
 You idea of containment does not work in the Internet age. I tried
 keeping this venue open in your defense. By closing off both
 hosef-managers and LUAU, the disagreement will spill elsewhere, and
 likely where you will not be able to retract the discussion.
 
 If any subscribers disagree, let me know.


I disagree, the threat of removing a subscriber from the list based on
what?  

To protect someone from themself, seems rather paternalistic.

To protect the integrity of the list or subject matter, seems
inconsistant with the range of subjects or lack thereof over recent
years.

--
Gary
___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org


Re: [LUAU] list moderation

2008-03-29 Thread Michael Bishop
Gary Sublett wrote:
 On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 07:05:12 -0700
 Vince Hoang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   
 You just don't get it. I am not turning on emergency moderation.
 Instead, I will remove both of you from LUAU until you settle your
 differences. I do not begrudge either of you. I think you both want
 what is best for HOSEF, but your strong personalities prevent you from
 finding common ground.

 You idea of containment does not work in the Internet age. I tried
 keeping this venue open in your defense. By closing off both
 hosef-managers and LUAU, the disagreement will spill elsewhere, and
 likely where you will not be able to retract the discussion.

 If any subscribers disagree, let me know.

 

 I disagree, the threat of removing a subscriber from the list based on
 what?  
   
Off-topic material. Jim said Scott wouldn't allow his posts through to 
HOSEF-manager where their thread belongs. So Jim took it to LUAU. The 
posts seem to cover more HOSEF board related business and personal 
issues rather than *nix related things.
 To protect someone from themself, seems rather paternalistic.
   
I see it more like protecting LUAU and the LUG. The most recent posts 
concern me greatly.
 To protect the integrity of the list or subject matter, seems
 inconsistant with the range of subjects or lack thereof over recent
 years.
   
Which has led to people leaving the list or becoming disgusted with 
LUAU/HOSEF. I think stronger moderation is in order. Especially with the 
recent threats of lawsuits and personal information leaks.
 --
 Gary
 ___
 LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
 http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org
   

___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org


Re: [LUAU] list moderation

2008-03-29 Thread Gary Sublett
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:11:29 -1000
Michael Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Gary Sublett wrote:
  On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 07:05:12 -0700
  Vince Hoang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

  You just don't get it. I am not turning on emergency moderation.
  Instead, I will remove both of you from LUAU until you settle your
  differences. I do not begrudge either of you. I think you both want
  what is best for HOSEF, but your strong personalities prevent you
  from finding common ground.
 
  You idea of containment does not work in the Internet age. I tried
  keeping this venue open in your defense. By closing off both
  hosef-managers and LUAU, the disagreement will spill elsewhere, and
  likely where you will not be able to retract the discussion.
 
  If any subscribers disagree, let me know.
 
  
 
  I disagree, the threat of removing a subscriber from the list based
  on what?  

 Off-topic material. Jim said Scott wouldn't allow his posts through
 to HOSEF-manager where their thread belongs. So Jim took it to LUAU.
 The posts seem to cover more HOSEF board related business and
 personal issues rather than *nix related things.
  To protect someone from themself, seems rather paternalistic.

 I see it more like protecting LUAU and the LUG. The most recent posts 
 concern me greatly.
  To protect the integrity of the list or subject matter, seems
  inconsistant with the range of subjects or lack thereof over recent
  years.

 Which has led to people leaving the list or becoming disgusted with 
 LUAU/HOSEF. I think stronger moderation is in order. Especially with
 the recent threats of lawsuits and personal information leaks.
  --
  Gary

 
Michael,

Vince asked for input from list members and I provided mine.

If this threatened removal from the list is based on being Off Topic,
it is IMHO an inconsistant action in light of what has been allowed on
the LUAU list over the last few years. For example, all the HOSEF
specific promotion, solicitation, etc.  If you or other list members
view all things HOSEF of interest/on topic/representative/a the face of
the LUAU community, then I find it mis-guided to frame the current
strife/activity of HOSEF (internal or external) as Off Topic.

You advocate stronger moderation, I disagree. Had there not been the
reported moderation (censorship) on the HOSEF managers list would we
be discussing this?

 --
Gary
___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org


Re: [LUAU] list moderation

2008-03-29 Thread 808blogger
this is a joke right?


On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 4:05 am, Vince Hoang wrote:
 You just don't get it. I am not turning on emergency moderation.
 Instead, I will remove both of you from LUAU until you settle your
 differences. I do not begrudge either of you. I think you both want
 what is best for HOSEF, but your strong personalities prevent you from
 finding common ground.

 You idea of containment does not work in the Internet age. I tried
 keeping this venue open in your defense. By closing off both
 hosef-managers and LUAU, the disagreement will spill elsewhere, and
 likely where you will not be able to retract the discussion.

 If any subscribers disagree, let me know.

 -Vince
 ___
 LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
 http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org
___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org


Re: [LUAU] list moderation

2008-03-29 Thread 808blogger
+1

 You advocate stronger moderation, I disagree. Had there not been the
 reported moderation (censorship) on the HOSEF managers list would we
 be discussing this?
___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org


Re: [LUAU] list moderation

2008-03-29 Thread Michael Bishop
Gary Sublett wrote:
 On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:11:29 -1000
 Michael Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   
 Gary Sublett wrote:
 
 On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 07:05:12 -0700
 Vince Hoang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   
   
 You just don't get it. I am not turning on emergency moderation.
 Instead, I will remove both of you from LUAU until you settle your
 differences. I do not begrudge either of you. I think you both want
 what is best for HOSEF, but your strong personalities prevent you
 from finding common ground.

 You idea of containment does not work in the Internet age. I tried
 keeping this venue open in your defense. By closing off both
 hosef-managers and LUAU, the disagreement will spill elsewhere, and
 likely where you will not be able to retract the discussion.

 If any subscribers disagree, let me know.

 
 
 I disagree, the threat of removing a subscriber from the list based
 on what?  
   
   
 Off-topic material. Jim said Scott wouldn't allow his posts through
 to HOSEF-manager where their thread belongs. So Jim took it to LUAU.
 The posts seem to cover more HOSEF board related business and
 personal issues rather than *nix related things.
 
 To protect someone from themself, seems rather paternalistic.
   
   
 I see it more like protecting LUAU and the LUG. The most recent posts 
 concern me greatly.
 
 To protect the integrity of the list or subject matter, seems
 inconsistant with the range of subjects or lack thereof over recent
 years.
   
   
 Which has led to people leaving the list or becoming disgusted with 
 LUAU/HOSEF. I think stronger moderation is in order. Especially with
 the recent threats of lawsuits and personal information leaks.
 
 --
 Gary
   

  
 Michael,

 Vince asked for input from list members and I provided mine.
   
I appreciate and respect your input. It provided a view point I may not 
have fully considered.
 If this threatened removal from the list is based on being Off Topic,
 it is IMHO an inconsistant action in light of what has been allowed on
 the LUAU list over the last few years. For example, all the HOSEF
 specific promotion, solicitation, etc.  If you or other list members
 view all things HOSEF of interest/on topic/representative/a the face of
 the LUAU community, then I find it mis-guided to frame the current
 strife/activity of HOSEF (internal or external) as Off Topic.
   
I agree that LUAU's moderation has been inconsistent. However, since 
there has been little to no previous moderation, we should never 
moderate? Should another moderated list be created that focuses on LUG 
issues?

The sole reason HOSEF-managers was created was to remove HOSEF internal 
discussions from the LUAU list. Due to the censorship of HOSEF-manages, 
I agree with the current spillover, but this discussion has been going 
on for weeks. I think it's time to resolve it and/or move it off-list. I 
recall that long flame-wars have been forced off-list in the past and 
people have been banned IIRC. Linux Dan, as an example, comes to mind.
 You advocate stronger moderation, I disagree. Had there not been the
 reported moderation (censorship) on the HOSEF managers list would we
 be discussing this?
   
I advocate stronger moderation on *this* list because I feel it should 
focus on LUG/*nix related stuff.

I disagree with any moderation of HOSEF-managers as I feel it should be 
an extension of the HOSEF meetings. I also feel the HOSEF-managers 
archives should be private.
  --
 Gary
 ___
 LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
 http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org
   

___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org


Re: [LUAU] list moderation

2008-03-29 Thread Vince Hoang
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Gary Sublett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Vince asked for input from list members and I provided mine.

Thanks. I would appreciate suggestions on alternatives that would
achieve the goal of keeping personal attacks off list. I want HOSEF
content back on hosef-managers, but it is the personal attacks that
triggered my [extreme] reaction.

  You advocate stronger moderation, I disagree. Had there not been the
  reported moderation (censorship) on the HOSEF managers list would we
  be discussing this?

+1. Sounds hypocritical doesn't it?

I don't like what I did but feel emergency moderation would have been
worse. I don't want heavy moderation and tried repeatedly on list and
off list to get the flames down. (They are still going quite heavily
off list and I don't think that will change soon.)

In a few days, we will need to look into me relinquishing my moderator
bit and/or moving the list to another domain.

Lots of people need to grow up, myself included.

-Vince
___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org


Re: [LUAU] list moderation

2008-03-29 Thread Peter Besenbruch
On Saturday 29 March 2008 16:43:04 Vince Hoang wrote:
 I want HOSEF
 content back on hosef-managers, but it is the personal attacks that
 triggered my [extreme] reaction.

I'm glad you did what you did. It was getting very ugly.

-- 
Hawaiian Astronomical Society: http://www.hawastsoc.org
HAS Deepsky Atlas: http://www.hawastsoc.org/deepsky
___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org


Re: [LUAU] list moderation

2008-03-27 Thread R. Scott Belford
I have no desire to moderate this list and do not understand this question.
I have never moderated LUAU for many good reasons.  I am not even an admin.
There has obviously been no moderation for the last few weeks.  It was today
that I reminded the current admin that he alone has the admin password, and
he has had it since I migrated the lists a few weeks ago away from our
outdated UH install and to Dreamhost.  Prior to that migration I asked if
anyone else wanted to host or to moderate this mailing list.  For a few
weeks anything and everything has been expressed on LUAU without regard to
any ethic or decorum.  I tried to give this list to the community, it was
not taken, and I have been paying to host it while my reputation and all
that HOSEF has done is slandered, slighted, libeled, and damaged by the very
people claiming that they don't have enough control over HOSEF to do
non-ecycling projects.  I'll let history judge this one.

Some action seems to have been taken today, at least by making the lists
private.  The world deservedly loves all that you have done to make this
list and more work, Vince, so I personally vote against your giving it up.
I completely reject any admin privileges.  I will continue hosting LUAU, and
I will continue wondering how many more questionable and actionable comments
are made.  Can someone please restore the decorum of this list *without*
using the word scott?

--scott


On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Vince Hoang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Let me know if you want my to give up moderation of the list and
 hand it to Scott. It is currently hosted on lists.hosef.org right now.

 I use moderation in quotes because I have tried very, very hard not
 to resort to heavy moderation and instead try to convince others to
 self-moderate.

 If you want me to continue to moderate, we will likely have to move
 the lists away from hosef.org and over to a new domain like
 freesoftwarehawaii.org.

 -Vince
 ___
 LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
 http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org

___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org


[LUAU] list moderation

2008-03-27 Thread Vince Hoang
Let me know if you want my to give up moderation of the list and
hand it to Scott. It is currently hosted on lists.hosef.org right now.

I use moderation in quotes because I have tried very, very hard not
to resort to heavy moderation and instead try to convince others to
self-moderate.

If you want me to continue to moderate, we will likely have to move
the lists away from hosef.org and over to a new domain like
freesoftwarehawaii.org.

-Vince
___
LUAU@lists.hosef.org mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/listinfo.cgi/luau-hosef.org