+1 to this but make Arora default. Firefox is garbage
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jeff Stone wrote:
> Unfortunately, whichever browser you chose, a bunch of potential users are
> going to be turned off. An alternative to consider is initially install no
> browser, then have a post-install s
Just be aware that I think chromium is not packaged on PCLinuxOS, so
they don't have the chromium choice. It's also the case for Debian and
Fedora.
Regards,
Julien Lavergne
Le mardi 02 février 2010 à 12:01 -0400, Glen Bizeau a écrit :
> Doing some looking at what some other distros do.
>
> http:
midori appears to use the same plugins as FF
> Thanks, Dwain, but actually I think Julien's right and I do see more
> problems with the script idea I suggested.
>
> To the rest of the list, it looks like PCLXDE (from a separate email) has
> quite a good software suite. FWIW, I'm officially on boa
Thanks, Dwain, but actually I think Julien's right and I do see more
problems with the script idea I suggested.
To the rest of the list, it looks like PCLXDE (from a separate email) has
quite a good software suite. FWIW, I'm officially on board with Midori.
Which begs the question, is there going
Doing some looking at what some other distros do.
http://blog.lxde.org/?p=423 PCLXDE (PCLinuxOS)
They include Midori as well.
http://blog.lxde.org/?p=569
Fedora 12 LXDE Spin includes FF
and I know the XFCE-LXDE of Debian does FF.
I am changing my Vote to Midori, it seems to cover the bases e
what about a little script that checks the amount of ram of the computer and
then set FF for more than 512mb ram as default and others when theres less
ram?
a window opening at first launch of the browser where you can choose
between some browsers seems also ok, but it has to be easy and clear. Th
The fact that there has been this much discussion on this topic is proof to
me that Jeff Stone's original idea is the way to go. If you make a hard to
change choice, many users will be unhappy. But if you make a good choice
with the default (Chromium or Midori or whatever) that will be OK, but m
I know we will not be all agree after this discussion. But I 'm
collecting arguments for all browsers to make a decision after the
discussion.
Regards,
Julien Lavergne
Le 2 févr. 2010 à 14:14, Glen Bizeau a écrit :
I think this is one of those time when we are all going to agree to
disag
I think this is one of those time when we are all going to agree to disagree...
Julien, if we go with Midori, can we put a script or shortcut on the
desktop that will install FF?
Personally I think this would fit the bill, have a lite browser, but
give users who don't know very much a "simple" wa
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:18:53 +0100
Sylkis wrote:
> If you put firefox in it, people will see lubuntu as not that fast
> distro - they won't differ if it's a bloated app or the system that
> runs poorply. and lubuntu's aim are slower computers, right? I just
> don't understand why even put firefox
If you put firefox in it, people will see lubuntu as not that fast
distro - they won't differ if it's a bloated app or the system that
runs poorply. and lubuntu's aim are slower computers, right? I just
don't understand why even put firefox on the list of considered
brosers, not mentioning putting
11 matches
Mail list logo
