Regarding to the menu editor, actually there is an easy fix.
To fork gnome menu editor and have it loads lxde-applications.menu
file instead of gnome's applications.menu.
It's written in python and patching this won't be too difficult.
However, maintaining a fork for such a project just to do this
Le jeudi 10 mars 2011 à 01:00 +0800, PCMan a écrit :
Regarding to the menu editor, actually there is an easy fix.
To fork gnome menu editor and have it loads lxde-applications.menu
file instead of gnome's applications.menu.
It's written in python and patching this won't be too difficult.
The problem with the 'do everything for everybody' approach is ending up
like xubuntu ie take a lightweight de and add all the bloat from ubuntu to
end up with something that is just as heavy.
Surely if people want the simple do everything out of the box approach
they can just use ubuntu.
Hai Tim,
Welcome on the mailing-list first of all. You seem to have a pretty clear
image in what might be efficient. You might enlighten us with your
definition of an efficient OS. Love to hear your thoughts.
Cheers, Chris
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 15:10, Tim Bernhard ohiom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:10:12 -0500
Tim Bernhard ohiom...@gmail.com wrote:
What should Lubuntu do?
I realize that being lightweight is a major focus for Lubuntu and I agree
100%. But keep in mind that the average user will have expectations for
their OS and that not everyone will use it
For me it's really three main areas.
First is battery consumption under normal use. I want my 8 hour battery
to last a close to 8 hours, not less than 6 like it did with Ubuntu.
Second, I look at the user interface. I hate having two task-bars when
everything I need will fit in one. I never
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Yorvyk yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:10:12 -0500
Tim Bernhard ohiom...@gmail.com wrote:
So my question is what dose the average user expect their OS to do out
of
the box? Pretend you are putting it on someone's machine.
For me the MOST important function would be support for older machines.
Regards,
REXMO
.___.
/ \
| O _ O |
/\_/\
.' / \ `.
/ _| |_ \
(_/ | | \_)
\ /
__\_-_/__
~;/ \;~
Don't mess with the
For me the MOST important function would be support for older machines.
We have to start from one fact: if Lubuntu can run in an acceptable way in
an old machine, it will run incredibly on a newer machine.
Let me use it with external monitors/TV as a basic media player (HDMI out)
For me,
qoute- You don't have to throw away your old machine, since it will revamp
a machine starting from a P2* and above giving you a full and ready to use
desktop in your own language.
/quote
Does the 11.04 edition in fact run on P2s? As I understand it support for
old CPUs was dropped from the
Well, at least 10.04 runs well on it... don't know if there's any project to
compile kernels for old cpus...
2011/2/25 PYROcomp rexmo...@gmail.com
qoute- You don't have to throw away your old machine, since it will
revamp a machine starting from a P2* and above giving you a full and ready
to
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:08:17 -0600
PYROcomp rexmo...@gmail.com wrote:
qoute- You don't have to throw away your old machine, since it will revamp
a machine starting from a P2* and above giving you a full and ready to use
desktop in your own language.
/quote
Does the 11.04 edition in fact
12 matches
Mail list logo
