[Lubuntu-desktop] Drupal theme od Lubuntu.net

2010-06-09 Thread Martin Malý

Hello,

you promised me that you will send me or upload the Drupal theme of 
Lubuntu.net. But nothing happened. Please, can you upload it for example 
here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Website ?


Thanks.  I'm waiting for 1 month...

Have a nice day.

Martin Malý
Czech Ubuntu community
martin.m...@xubuntu.cz

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Lubuntu-desktop] help for mouse use

2010-06-09 Thread paolo liut
I have the black pointer of my mouse that I cannot see in terminal mode(
black on black).
I am going to change this situation: anyone can help me!
Thank u
Paolo
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Lubuntu-desktop] Change the goals of PCManFM 1.0

2010-06-09 Thread PCMan
Hi list,
After observing the reaction of users to the new pcmanfm and gathering
some feedback, I'm now thinking about the necessity to change goals
for 1.0 release.
The major problems encountered by most users seem to be:
1. They don't want gvfs, or if they use it outside gnome, it can be
problematic sometimes.
2. Volume management doesn't work sometimes due to some unknown issue of gvfs.
3. Tree view in the side pane is not available.
4. File searching utility is gone.

So, I'm considering if a revise for 1.0 plan is needed. It's stable in
current status, but it's functionality doesn't match the older series.
This make many people reluctant to upgrade.
The proposed changes to 1.0 are:
1. To implement volume mounting wth udisks and don't completely rely
on gvfs for this.
This won't be too difficult and only requires some coding. This can
make pcmanfm work well without gvfs, which solves #2 and partially
solves #1.
2. Try to add support for tree view to side pane again. I already came
up with a better way to implement it last week. So I'm confident that
this can be done.
3. Leave search utility since it's a Google SoC project now and as the
old one doesn't work correctly, leaving this won't affect much.
4. A developer from the community is trying to work on template
support, so you can create new files based on some template files in
the popup menu. It's still a work in progress, but since it's simple,
can we include this in 1.0?

I want to make an exception for the feature-freeze and add the missing
features udisks and dir tree prior to 1.0. Then it's possible to
totally replace the old pcmanfm with it.
Of course we can do them in branch and leave 1.0 as it is now, but
this may cause problems in promotion and since some old features are
missing, replacing the old series can be more difficult. Missing
features can give the new pcmanfm a bad name sometimes even its
internal structure is much better than the old one.

Any comments?

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Lxde-list] Change the goals of PCManFM 1.0

2010-06-09 Thread Zsolt Peter Basak
Hello

In my opinion you should release a stable one with the version of 1.0.
If you always want to make a perfect software (in every aspect), the
usual thing can happen when the software won't ever be done since you
always want to change something, the users always want something. The
current state is okay I guess, distros could already ship it. The
change what you talk about is important, but not crucial. In my
opinion it's all ok for a 1.1 version , but this is only my personal
opinion. (Only some distro ships with rc version. Some still ships
with the 0.5 .. oh my. Some only includes it if it gets a stable/final
'mark'. *I* say, the old 1.0 goals are totally ok.)

ps.: Now... where should I send this message ? Sorry if reply to all
list is not the correct way.
Peter

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:45 AM, PCMan pcman...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi list,
 After observing the reaction of users to the new pcmanfm and gathering
 some feedback, I'm now thinking about the necessity to change goals
 for 1.0 release.
 The major problems encountered by most users seem to be:
 1. They don't want gvfs, or if they use it outside gnome, it can be
 problematic sometimes.
 2. Volume management doesn't work sometimes due to some unknown issue of gvfs.
 3. Tree view in the side pane is not available.
 4. File searching utility is gone.

 So, I'm considering if a revise for 1.0 plan is needed. It's stable in
 current status, but it's functionality doesn't match the older series.
 This make many people reluctant to upgrade.
 The proposed changes to 1.0 are:
 1. To implement volume mounting wth udisks and don't completely rely
 on gvfs for this.
 This won't be too difficult and only requires some coding. This can
 make pcmanfm work well without gvfs, which solves #2 and partially
 solves #1.
 2. Try to add support for tree view to side pane again. I already came
 up with a better way to implement it last week. So I'm confident that
 this can be done.
 3. Leave search utility since it's a Google SoC project now and as the
 old one doesn't work correctly, leaving this won't affect much.
 4. A developer from the community is trying to work on template
 support, so you can create new files based on some template files in
 the popup menu. It's still a work in progress, but since it's simple,
 can we include this in 1.0?

 I want to make an exception for the feature-freeze and add the missing
 features udisks and dir tree prior to 1.0. Then it's possible to
 totally replace the old pcmanfm with it.
 Of course we can do them in branch and leave 1.0 as it is now, but
 this may cause problems in promotion and since some old features are
 missing, replacing the old series can be more difficult. Missing
 features can give the new pcmanfm a bad name sometimes even its
 internal structure is much better than the old one.

 Any comments?

 --
 ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
 GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
 lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win:
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
 ___
 Lxde-list mailing list
 lxde-l...@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Lxde-list] Change the goals of PCManFM 1.0

2010-06-09 Thread PCMan
Another option might be release 1.0 with current feature set, but
create a branch for 1.5 and do the development in parellel, just like
what Firefox has done in the past. Then both the stable branch and the
development 1.5 branch can have releases. So users who requires new
features can ship the 1.5.x version. Maybe this is a better idea, and
this can be documented in the release note of 1.0.

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Zsolt Peter Basak
shiki.biomer...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello

 In my opinion you should release a stable one with the version of 1.0.
 If you always want to make a perfect software (in every aspect), the
 usual thing can happen when the software won't ever be done since you
 always want to change something, the users always want something. The
 current state is okay I guess, distros could already ship it. The
 change what you talk about is important, but not crucial. In my
 opinion it's all ok for a 1.1 version , but this is only my personal
 opinion. (Only some distro ships with rc version. Some still ships
 with the 0.5 .. oh my. Some only includes it if it gets a stable/final
 'mark'. *I* say, the old 1.0 goals are totally ok.)

 ps.: Now... where should I send this message ? Sorry if reply to all
 list is not the correct way.
 Peter

 On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:45 AM, PCMan pcman...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi list,
 After observing the reaction of users to the new pcmanfm and gathering
 some feedback, I'm now thinking about the necessity to change goals
 for 1.0 release.
 The major problems encountered by most users seem to be:
 1. They don't want gvfs, or if they use it outside gnome, it can be
 problematic sometimes.
 2. Volume management doesn't work sometimes due to some unknown issue of 
 gvfs.
 3. Tree view in the side pane is not available.
 4. File searching utility is gone.

 So, I'm considering if a revise for 1.0 plan is needed. It's stable in
 current status, but it's functionality doesn't match the older series.
 This make many people reluctant to upgrade.
 The proposed changes to 1.0 are:
 1. To implement volume mounting wth udisks and don't completely rely
 on gvfs for this.
 This won't be too difficult and only requires some coding. This can
 make pcmanfm work well without gvfs, which solves #2 and partially
 solves #1.
 2. Try to add support for tree view to side pane again. I already came
 up with a better way to implement it last week. So I'm confident that
 this can be done.
 3. Leave search utility since it's a Google SoC project now and as the
 old one doesn't work correctly, leaving this won't affect much.
 4. A developer from the community is trying to work on template
 support, so you can create new files based on some template files in
 the popup menu. It's still a work in progress, but since it's simple,
 can we include this in 1.0?

 I want to make an exception for the feature-freeze and add the missing
 features udisks and dir tree prior to 1.0. Then it's possible to
 totally replace the old pcmanfm with it.
 Of course we can do them in branch and leave 1.0 as it is now, but
 this may cause problems in promotion and since some old features are
 missing, replacing the old series can be more difficult. Missing
 features can give the new pcmanfm a bad name sometimes even its
 internal structure is much better than the old one.

 Any comments?

 --
 ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
 GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
 lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win:
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
 ___
 Lxde-list mailing list
 lxde-l...@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list


 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 Post to     : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Lxde-list] Change the goals of PCManFM 1.0

2010-06-09 Thread Zsolt Peter Basak
Yes this is a good idea, a nice way I guess. This way, you would keep
the version tradition.

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:32 AM, PCMan pcman...@gmail.com wrote:
 Another option might be release 1.0 with current feature set, but
 create a branch for 1.5 and do the development in parellel, just like
 what Firefox has done in the past. Then both the stable branch and the
 development 1.5 branch can have releases. So users who requires new
 features can ship the 1.5.x version. Maybe this is a better idea, and
 this can be documented in the release note of 1.0.

 On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Zsolt Peter Basak
 shiki.biomer...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello

 In my opinion you should release a stable one with the version of 1.0.
 If you always want to make a perfect software (in every aspect), the
 usual thing can happen when the software won't ever be done since you
 always want to change something, the users always want something. The
 current state is okay I guess, distros could already ship it. The
 change what you talk about is important, but not crucial. In my
 opinion it's all ok for a 1.1 version , but this is only my personal
 opinion. (Only some distro ships with rc version. Some still ships
 with the 0.5 .. oh my. Some only includes it if it gets a stable/final
 'mark'. *I* say, the old 1.0 goals are totally ok.)

 ps.: Now... where should I send this message ? Sorry if reply to all
 list is not the correct way.
 Peter

 On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:45 AM, PCMan pcman...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi list,
 After observing the reaction of users to the new pcmanfm and gathering
 some feedback, I'm now thinking about the necessity to change goals
 for 1.0 release.
 The major problems encountered by most users seem to be:
 1. They don't want gvfs, or if they use it outside gnome, it can be
 problematic sometimes.
 2. Volume management doesn't work sometimes due to some unknown issue of 
 gvfs.
 3. Tree view in the side pane is not available.
 4. File searching utility is gone.

 So, I'm considering if a revise for 1.0 plan is needed. It's stable in
 current status, but it's functionality doesn't match the older series.
 This make many people reluctant to upgrade.
 The proposed changes to 1.0 are:
 1. To implement volume mounting wth udisks and don't completely rely
 on gvfs for this.
 This won't be too difficult and only requires some coding. This can
 make pcmanfm work well without gvfs, which solves #2 and partially
 solves #1.
 2. Try to add support for tree view to side pane again. I already came
 up with a better way to implement it last week. So I'm confident that
 this can be done.
 3. Leave search utility since it's a Google SoC project now and as the
 old one doesn't work correctly, leaving this won't affect much.
 4. A developer from the community is trying to work on template
 support, so you can create new files based on some template files in
 the popup menu. It's still a work in progress, but since it's simple,
 can we include this in 1.0?

 I want to make an exception for the feature-freeze and add the missing
 features udisks and dir tree prior to 1.0. Then it's possible to
 totally replace the old pcmanfm with it.
 Of course we can do them in branch and leave 1.0 as it is now, but
 this may cause problems in promotion and since some old features are
 missing, replacing the old series can be more difficult. Missing
 features can give the new pcmanfm a bad name sometimes even its
 internal structure is much better than the old one.

 Any comments?

 --
 ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
 GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
 lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win:
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
 ___
 Lxde-list mailing list
 lxde-l...@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list


 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 Post to     : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp