[Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-13 Thread Julien Lavergne
version 0.4 uploaded, waiting in NEW.

-- 
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct subscriber.

Status in Ubuntu: In Progress
Status in “pam” package in Debian: Invalid

Bug description:
I have a preliminary seed and meta for this related to Karmic blueprint 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-karmic-lxde-ubuntu-desktop 
and this should get uploaded to revu later today.

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
Through New as well and in the archive.

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: In Progress = Fix Released

-- 
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct subscriber.

Status in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “pam” package in Debian: Invalid

Bug description:
I have a preliminary seed and meta for this related to Karmic blueprint 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-karmic-lxde-ubuntu-desktop 
and this should get uploaded to revu later today.

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-11 Thread David Sugar
** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New = In Progress

** Changed in: ubuntu
 Assignee: (unassigned) = David Sugar (dyfet)

-- 
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct subscriber.

Status in Ubuntu: In Progress
Status in “pam” package in Debian: Invalid

Bug description:
I have a preliminary seed and meta for this related to Karmic blueprint 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-karmic-lxde-ubuntu-desktop 
and this should get uploaded to revu later today.

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-08 Thread Julien Lavergne
Just to have a clarification, is the open-team a blocker for MOTU-Release ACK ? 
Even if it could generate some problems in Lubuntu team itself, a MOTU 
sponsorship is still needed to modify the seed package in the archive.
This open-team issue is still under discussion in the Lubuntu team.

-- 
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct subscriber.

Status in Ubuntu: New
Status in “pam” package in Debian: Invalid

Bug description:
I have a preliminary seed and meta for this related to Karmic blueprint 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-karmic-lxde-ubuntu-desktop 
and this should get uploaded to revu later today.

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
I don't see it as a blocker.

-- 
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct subscriber.

Status in Ubuntu: New
Status in “pam” package in Debian: Invalid

Bug description:
I have a preliminary seed and meta for this related to Karmic blueprint 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-karmic-lxde-ubuntu-desktop 
and this should get uploaded to revu later today.

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-05 Thread Oliver Grawert
i'm definately for adding the metapackage to universe (even though
requesting it early enough pre FF would have been  a lot nicer) but i
fully agree with scotts suggestion here, having an open and completely
uncontrolled team anyone can subscribe to in control of the seeds seems
very dangerous (anyone of that team can just add or remove apps from
your seeds), it is like crying for problems or bzr commit wars where
packages are added/removed back and forth out of disagreement ...

my suggestion would be to create a lubunbtu-developers team with a kind of 
developer council or other form of governance and keep the lubuntu team open as 
it is atm. then people wanting to join lubuntu-developers would have to go 
through a staging process through the open lubuntu team, prove they are 
trustable for some time and be added to lubuntu-developers by an 
admin/council/dictator (or whatever form you pick for governance) 
lubuntu-developers in the end should own all code centric branches then

-- 
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct subscriber.

Status in Ubuntu: New
Status in “pam” package in Debian: New

Bug description:
I have a preliminary seed and meta for this related to Karmic blueprint 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-karmic-lxde-ubuntu-desktop 
and this should get uploaded to revu later today.

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-05 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:23 AM, David Sugar wrote:
 Second, I suggest given that UDS for Karmic +1 is likely going to be
 in two months, that we draft a new spec for that UDS for/from and most
 especially WITH the Lubuntu team and community.  Indeed, it is the
 approach of UDS is one reason I think it would be good to establish some
 things like governance now rather than to do so later.

Given how late in the game we are, what if we focused on helping
Andrew polish his LXDE packages with nicer default settings than it
currently has, possibly with an Ubuntu theme from the background
image, GTK2 theme and OpenBox theme for Karmic?

Then we could meet at the upcoming UDS to properly plan this and enjoy
the whole Karmic+1 cycle to produce a superb Lubuntu release for the
next Ubuntu LTS.

Personally, I feel that this is necessary, especially from the
perspective that FF is already in place and we suddenly get a dozen of
ideas as to what would constitute a good default selection of
applications and a good Lbuntu theme.

How does that sound?

Martin-Éric

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread StefanPotyra
Hi,

just subscribed ogra and StevenK. ogra: you've registered the spec in
the first place, how do you feel about adding that meta package at this
point in the release cycle? I assume this mainly impacts MID?


@StevenK: If this mainly impacts MID, then I guess it's your domain ;).

Cheers,
Stefan.

-- 
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct subscriber.

Status in Ubuntu: New

Bug description:
I have a preliminary seed and meta for this related to Karmic blueprint 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-karmic-lxde-ubuntu-desktop 
and this should get uploaded to revu later today.

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
In principle adding a metapackage is not a big deal.  Do you expect ISO
images for lubuntu to be built on Launchpad?  Do you have a governance
process for deciding what should be in the package?

-- 
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct subscriber.

Status in Ubuntu: New

Bug description:
I have a preliminary seed and meta for this related to Karmic blueprint 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-karmic-lxde-ubuntu-desktop 
and this should get uploaded to revu later today.

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
Additionally, the seeds are currently controlled by an open team with
118 members.  I do not see this as a recipe for success.

-- 
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct subscriber.

Status in Ubuntu: New

Bug description:
I have a preliminary seed and meta for this related to Karmic blueprint 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-karmic-lxde-ubuntu-desktop 
and this should get uploaded to revu later today.

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread Mario Behling
Hi,

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:13 PM, David Sugardavid.su...@canonical.com wrote:
 Lol!  While I appreciate the vote of confidence, the goal was NEVER to
 have a dictatorship, benevolent or otherwise!

Thanks for making this clear. The goal for lubuntu was from the start
to build a strong and broad community, that can take care of tasks.
For example Debian packages that have been made available during
recent months by Andrew Lee and others were also planned and released
to lay the groundwork for lubuntu.

 I think what Scott says about some form of formalizing governance is
 actually very correct.

How should a formalizing governance look like? Is it necessary at this stage?

 However, the meta package (any meta-package
 instance) has a snapshot instance of the seed; it does not pull or re-
 germinate it when it builds.  Hence, as long as it is safe at the time
 of submission, a given update of the package will be safe, well, at
 least for the current one.  Also, we could setup a separate release
 subteam that is not open commit, and have it moved to there.  I think we
 should hold a quick IRC meeting in any case to ratify some basic
 governance...

I suggest to meet on IRC freenode #lubuntu
on Sep. 6, 15.00 GMT
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=5month=9year=2009hour=15min=0sec=0p1=0

Please help to set up an agenda:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/IRC_Meeting_September_6, 2009

Please also have a look at existing IRC meet ups to understand
decisions that have been made for reasons stated in previous meet up
logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/IRC_Meetings

- Mario

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-08-31 Thread Mario Behling
Dear all,

lynxis has put together a lubuntu-iso to test:

http://lynxis.crew.c-base.org

All the best,

Mario



2009/8/31 Martin-Éric Racine q-f...@iki.fi:
 On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Julien
 Lavergnejulien.laver...@gmail.com wrote:
 @Martin-Éric
 An exception is only necessary for the first inclusion of the package. 
 Adjusting dependencies (default applications) can be made without exceptions 
 (unless most of applications changed).

 Ah, that's good to hear.

 IMO, another lubuntu package is not necessary, because there is already
 lxde meta-packages which pull LXDE components (see lxde-common source
 package). If we are not happy with this, we could modify it to include
 packages we want, instead of splitting the seed.

 Actually, we at least need a separate theme package. Personally, I
 don't care for most of the default applications currently included, so
  I'd rather install some meta-package that pulls a theme and sets it
 as the default, in addition to pulling core LXDE packages.

 Is there any way I could branch the seed and propose changes to that
 via a branch, before the team agrees on what the meta-package will be
 and makes a first upload?


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-08-31 Thread Glen Bizeau
I like them, especially logo 2

Glen

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Mario Behlingm...@mariobehling.de wrote:
 Dear all,

 enclosed a few desktop backgrounds and images I collected from the
 lubuntu designer forum at the lxde website.

 Please include.

 Best,

 Mario

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 Post to     : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-08-31 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Mario Behlingm...@mariobehling.de wrote:
 Dear all,

 enclosed a few desktop backgrounds and images I collected from the
 lubuntu designer forum at the lxde website.

 Please include.

I personally like the all-blue background with the bubbly logo best.
I'd however omit the LXDE logo from the Ubuntu circle, since it looks
like some creepy insect. Instead, I'd focus on this nearly translucent
bubbly Ubuntu circle and adopt that as our logo, for the boot splash,
desktop background and Start menu icon.

FWIW, here, I've been using an orange and grey theme on my desktop. If
you look at the default themes that come with OpenBox, there's one
with orangeish window title bars that look very Ubuntu-Human friendly.
Combining this with some greyscale version of the bubbly Ubuntu
circle, we'd have ourselves some really cool Lubuntu style: Ubuntu
orange with LXDE grey and blue. We could use those 3 colors as our
primaries for our version of the Ubuntu circle logo and as our colors
for the default desktop theme, in combination with the Ubuntu Human
icon theme.

How does that sound?

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp