Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-24 Thread Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset
Hiyas everybody:

I picked another PC to see how is the resource consumption changing
depending on the hardware, and the result is this:

On a new machine (AMD Turion Dual Core M520, 3GB RAM ~ Lubuntu 10.10)
Aqualung 4%CPU 32RAM
Deadbeef 4%CPU 25RAM
Audacious 4%CPU 17RAM

On my old laptop (P3 700MHZ, 256MB RAM ~ Lubuntu 10.04):
Aqualung 28%CPU 28RAM
Deadbeef 16%CPU 24RAM
Audacious 9%CPU 19RAM

Freshly installed Audacious consumes a little more RAM, i think because is
doing something on the background... can you check again for it Julien? For
me, first run was about 28RAM and minutes later and all the runs after that
were about 18RAM.

I'll try to send a report from the computers i have acces to.
Hope it helps on the decision!

-- jpxsat
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-15 Thread Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset
In my machine:
Aqualung:28%CPU / 28 Mb Ram
Deadbeef:15-17%CPU / 24 Mb Ram

Audacious:   9%CPU / 19 Mb Ram (my favourite)


For others:

Less RAM consumption scenario:
Deadbeef   80% CPU usage   23 MB RAM
Aqualung50% CPU usage   26 MB RAM

Less CPU consumption scenario:
Deadbeef : 18 % CPU / 25 Mb RAM
Aqualung : 25 % CPU / 33 Mb RAM


I tested them on a 731mhz 256MB ram Machine, so far between Deadbeef and
Aqualung i prefer from far Deadbeef.

But let me tell you that the behaviour of Audacious compared to these two
others is far better. Is there something that i'm missing with this program?

--
jpxsat
Ubuntu user #29.157 (Lubuntu 10.04)
Linux user #522.597
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-15 Thread Julien Lavergne
Le lundi 15 novembre 2010 à 09:43 -0300, Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset a
écrit :
 But let me tell you that the behaviour of Audacious compared to these
 two others is far better. Is there something that i'm missing with
 this program?

I also try audacious, and the result was not so fantastic : CPU 22%, RAM
27 Mb. It's similar to aqualung.

To see a real boost ... try to use gnome-mplayer : CPU 6%, RAM 15 Mb !
But the bad point is that the GUI is not really good when you use it as
a music player.

Regards,
Julien Lavergne


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-15 Thread David Sugar
I have personally come to love exaile.  But this more had to do with
Rhythmbox having many additional gnome dependencies, where exaile does
not.  On the other hand neither is truly lightweight.

On 11/15/2010 02:13 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
 Le lundi 15 novembre 2010 à 09:43 -0300, Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset a
 écrit :
 But let me tell you that the behaviour of Audacious compared to these
 two others is far better. Is there something that i'm missing with
 this program?
 
 I also try audacious, and the result was not so fantastic : CPU 22%, RAM
 27 Mb. It's similar to aqualung.
 
 To see a real boost ... try to use gnome-mplayer : CPU 6%, RAM 15 Mb !
 But the bad point is that the GUI is not really good when you use it as
 a music player.
 
 Regards,
 Julien Lavergne
 
 
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
attachment: dyfet.vcf___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-15 Thread Yorvyk
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:47:18 +
Yorvyk yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com wrote:

 On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:13:22 +0100
 Julien Lavergne gi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 
  Le lundi 15 novembre 2010 à 09:43 -0300, Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset a
  écrit :
   But let me tell you that the behaviour of Audacious compared to these
   two others is far better. Is there something that i'm missing with
   this program?
  
  I also try audacious, and the result was not so fantastic : CPU 22%, RAM
  27 Mb. It's similar to aqualung.
  
  To see a real boost ... try to use gnome-mplayer : CPU 6%, RAM 15 Mb !
  But the bad point is that the GUI is not really good when you use it as
  a music player.
  
 I’ve tried Audacious as well, and get results some where in between Aqualung 
 and DeadBeef.  As I said earlier, there isn’t really much to choose from 
 between them and none really shines above the others.
 
 
Don’t know why I sent the previous message before finishing it.
I have used Aqualung, Audacious  DeadBeef throughout today for listening to a 
great variety of music, podcasts and the live stream of Linux Outlaws. and all 
of them coped perfectly well.  The one area they struggled with was the initial 
scanning of my music collection, currently nearly 28,000 tracks at 200 GiB.  I 
abandoned it after a couple of hours as none appeared to be more than ⅓ the way 
through,  Rhythmbox only takes 2 hours from a clean install.  I don’t really 
organise my music with the player, so didn’t investigate that side of things.  
Generally I just want the player to play tracks at random while I’m working at 
the computer and all of them did this.
I’ll leave others, who need play lists, etc. to discuss those aspects.


-- 
Steve Cook (Yorvyk)

http://lubuntu.net 

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-14 Thread Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset
Sorry, last line was:
System without Audacious running: 86MB
System with Audacious running: 93MB

--
jpxsat
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-14 Thread Julien Lavergne
Le samedi 13 novembre 2010 à 20:10 +, Yorvyk a écrit :
 A quick test of the two, using a two song play list with one each mp3
  ogg gave:
 
 Deadbeef80% CPU usage   23 MB RAM
 Aqualung50% CPU usage   26 MB RAM 

Doing the same test on my testing box :

Deadbeef : 18 % CPU / 25 Mb RAM
Aqualung : 25 % CPU / 33 Mb RAM

Looks like the behavior may be different on different hardware.

Regards,
Julien Lavergne


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-13 Thread Yorvyk
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:39:33 +0100
Julien Lavergne gi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Le mercredi 10 novembre 2010 à 23:36 +, Andrew Woodhead a écrit :
  Deadbeef is the nuts. I can't rate it highly enough :)
 
 But you should be more verbose than this if you want to convince us :)
 
 
A quick test of the two, using a two song play list with one each mp3  ogg 
gave:

Deadbeef80% CPU usage   23 MB RAM
Aqualung50% CPU usage   26 MB RAM


-- 
Steve Cook (Yorvyk)

http://lubuntu.net 

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Lubuntu-desktop] Deadbeef in Lubuntu PPA

2010-11-10 Thread Julien Lavergne
Hi,

I worked on the packaging of deadbeef, and I think I'm close to
something suitable for upload in official repository. Thanks to the work
of the Debian Maintainer and the PPA maintainer.

The result will be available in a few minutes in the Lubuntu PPA [1],
for Maverick and Natty.

It's not a secret that the music player choice will be discuss. So, if
you want to discuss this topic, please use this package and report what
you think about it, and the good / bad points, compare to aqualung.

Also, feel free to report bugs on the current package :)

Regards,
Julien Lavergne

[1] : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop/+archive/ppa


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp