Le 11/26/2011 07:22 AM, Jonathan Marsden a écrit :
On 11/25/2011 10:02 PM, Andrew Woodhead wrote:
gnome3 uses dconf not gconf, so as gnome2 is dying or dead, we all
must move on and use what is supported upstream.
That makes sense, thanks. Actually it looks like we are supposed to
migrate
On 11/26/2011 01:07 AM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
No, the priority is the glade migration because only Lubuntu specific
packages are involved.
OK, that helps. Is there documentation out there somewhere about what
to replace glade with? Examples, tutorials, whatever? Is using glade
3.10.x (and
I guess it's possible to remove glade and 'hard-code' the interface, but it
might take a while.
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:36:46 -0800
Jonathan Marsden jmars...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On 11/26/2011 01:07 AM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
No, the priority is the glade migration because only Lubuntu
On 11/26/2011 01:38 AM, Michael Rawson wrote:
I guess it's possible to remove glade and 'hard-code' the interface,
but it might take a while.
That would be a step backwards in terms of long term maintainability,
though. I'm assuming there is a better replacement for glade, or an
upgrade for
Le 11/26/2011 10:36 AM, Jonathan Marsden a écrit :
On 11/26/2011 01:07 AM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
No, the priority is the glade migration because only Lubuntu specific
packages are involved.
OK, that helps. Is there documentation out there somewhere about what
to replace glade with?
Am 26.11.2011 11:18, schrieb Julien Lavergne:
Le 11/26/2011 10:36 AM, Jonathan Marsden a écrit :
On 11/26/2011 01:07 AM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
No, the priority is the glade migration because only Lubuntu specific
packages are involved.
OK, that helps. Is there documentation out there
GtkBuilder should be the replacement for libglade.
Glade 3 can output GtkBuilder format ui files.
However, not all features provided by libglade are supported by GtkBuilder.
In addition, the two formats are not compatible.
Code used to load the ui xml files need to be re-written, too.
Besides,
Le 26 nov. 2011 à 11:49, Leszek Lesner leszek.les...@web.de a écrit :
Am 26.11.2011 11:18, schrieb Julien Lavergne:
Le 11/26/2011 10:36 AM, Jonathan Marsden a écrit :
On 11/26/2011 01:07 AM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
No, the priority is the glade migration because only Lubuntu specific
For Precise, we have several work items (15, according to
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-lubuntu-p-optimizations
) that are related to killing gconf and glade.
I'd like to look at what this takes and why we are doing it; was there a
general Ubuntu-wide blueprint defining why
On 11/25/2011 10:02 PM, Andrew Woodhead wrote:
gnome3 uses dconf not gconf, so as gnome2 is dying or dead, we all
must move on and use what is supported upstream.
That makes sense, thanks. Actually it looks like we are supposed to
migrate from gconf to GSettings, which is a higher level
10 matches
Mail list logo
