Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] USC
On 02/08/2011 01:11, Julien Lavergne wrote: Le Saturday 30 July 2011 à 17:03 +0200, Stefano a écrit : hi, i had a look to the ubuntu-software-center branch, my consideration are: 1 - the branch is not so clear (imho) 2 - USC uses app-install-data, wich was part of gnome-app-install, an old gnome package-installer if we want a light USC we have to remove: * Reviews * Votes * apps for purchase (and Ubuntu One logger) * History of installed-removed packages (maybe not) really i don't know where to start I did a quick modification to software center trunk to isolate the interested parts : https://code.launchpad.net/~gilir/+junk/software-center-lxde You need to look at 2 files : software-center-lxde softwarecenter/ui/gtk/appmini.py There is a #TODO on appmini.py to start drawing the UI. Sorry, I can't help more since I'm not familiar with USC code, you need to look at it to find any useful functions needed for your UI. Regards, Julien Lavergne thank you, will we use gtk.Builder to build the UI or simple-clean code (e.g. self.button = gtk.Button(press me!)? ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] USC
i prefere the code, because the xml files (gtk.builder file) are too difficult to edit by hand. anyway can gazpacho work for it? On 02/08/2011 19:00, Julien Lavergne wrote: Le Tuesday 02 August 2011 à 11:10 +0200, Stefano a écrit : thank you, will we use gtk.Builder to build the UI or simple-clean code (e.g. self.button = gtk.Button(press me!)? It's probably simpler to use gtk.Builder. Regards, Julien Lavergne ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] USC
Please use Glade to edit GtkBuilder. Don't use Gaspacho. Nobody edits the xml files by hands. GtkBuilder is the way to go. On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Stefano eco.st...@fastwebnet.it wrote: i prefere the code, because the xml files (gtk.builder file) are too difficult to edit by hand. anyway can gazpacho work for it? On 02/08/2011 19:00, Julien Lavergne wrote: Le Tuesday 02 August 2011 à 11:10 +0200, Stefano a écrit : thank you, will we use gtk.Builder to build the UI or simple-clean code (e.g. self.button = gtk.Button(press me!)? It's probably simpler to use gtk.Builder. Regards, Julien Lavergne ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Lubuntu-desktop] USC
hi, i had a look to the ubuntu-software-center branch, my consideration are: 1 - the branch is not so clear (imho) 2 - USC uses app-install-data, wich was part of gnome-app-install, an old gnome package-installer if we want a light USC we have to remove: * Reviews * Votes * apps for purchase (and Ubuntu One logger) * History of installed-removed packages (maybe not) really i don't know where to start Stephen Smally ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
