I think the excitement about documentation is great, you can never
work too hard on documentation. However I don't see the value in
creating yet another source. I'd be more excited to see people
contributing to the already existing documentation on the Wiki [0],
the help site [1] [2] and the
I'd suggest that you do some investigate to see what's the cause of
performance problems of software center first, and to see if avoiding
them is possible. If it's not possible to avoid the performance
problems, then go for a simplified synaptic.
This could save you quite a lot of time for try and
Hi,
I don't get as much time as I'd like to keep up with the various How To's,
but the IRC support guys do keep the FAQ section [1] updated regularly.
Regards,
Phill.
[1] https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation/FAQ
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:43 AM, James Gifford
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:52:54 -0400
Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset jpx...@gmail.com wrote:
we need a simplex synaptic or a lighter USC?
A lighter USC - synaptic if far too complicated for the average user :/
In what way is Synaptic 'far too complicated'?
To make USC faster all that needs
Some may noted that the development of pcmanfm and other lxde stuff
slowed down significantly recently.
I'm currently preparing for my license examination in order to get my
license for internal medicine specialty.
The examination will be on Sep 24 and on Oct 16. If I can pass the
exam, I'll have
Le Friday 29 July 2011 à 15:44 +0100, Yorvyk a écrit :
A lighter USC - synaptic if far too complicated for the average
user :/
In what way is Synaptic 'far too complicated'?
To make USC faster all that needs doing is the unnecessary bits
removed. Get rid of the reviews and pretty
Of course, your job and specialty are things that make you disappear,
just like everybody who has a job outside here, and even more if
there're licenses (exams) near. ou have updated a lot of things these
days (yes, we read your blog too :) ) and the actual status of PCManFM
is quite stable and
This mean, for example, hide the libs or other not-app packages by default?
On 29/07/2011 18:01, Julien Lavergne wrote:
Le Friday 29 July 2011 à 15:44 +0100, Yorvyk a écrit :
A lighter USC - synaptic if far too complicated for the average
user :/
In what way is Synaptic 'far too
2011/7/29 Stefano eco.st...@fastwebnet.it
This mean, for example, hide the libs or other not-app packages by default?
Exactly! It must make the difference between packages and applications
for it to be user-friendly :)
___
Mailing list:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:23:46 -0400
Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset jpx...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/29 Stefano eco.st...@fastwebnet.it
This mean, for example, hide the libs or other not-app packages by default?
Exactly! It must make the difference between packages and applications
for it to be
I echo Rafael's comments. PCManFM is nice and stable. Get your exams done,
I'm sure you will do well :)
Regards,
Phill.
2011/7/29 神癒礁湖 (Rafael Laguna) rafaellag...@gmail.com
**
Of course, your job and specialty are things that make you disappear,
just like everybody who has a job outside
11 matches
Mail list logo
