[Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
In principle adding a metapackage is not a big deal. Do you expect ISO images for lubuntu to be built on Launchpad? Do you have a governance process for deciding what should be in the package? -- [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513 You received this

[Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
Additionally, the seeds are currently controlled by an open team with 118 members. I do not see this as a recipe for success. -- [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu, which is a

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
I don't see it as a blocker. -- [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu, which is a direct subscriber. Status in Ubuntu: New Status in “pam” package in Debian: Invalid Bug description:

[Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
Through New as well and in the archive. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu, which is a direct subscriber. Status

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] New Ubuntu Weekly Newsletter section

2011-12-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
None of these are derivatives (Mint is a derivative). These are other distribution products developed in the Ubuntu project. I think it's much more correct to refer to them as siblings to Ubuntu (Desktop) and Ubuntu Server. I know you didn't make up this terminology, but in no sense of the word

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] New Ubuntu Weekly Newsletter section

2011-12-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
On 12/06/2011 12:28 AM, Amber Graner wrote: On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote: None of these are derivatives (Mint is a derivative). These are other distribution products developed in the Ubuntu project. I think it's much more correct to refer

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] New Ubuntu Weekly Newsletter section

2011-12-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
On 12/06/2011 12:52 AM, Amber Graner wrote: On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote: On 12/06/2011 12:28 AM, Amber Graner wrote: On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote: None of these are derivatives (Mint