Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] IRC Client

2011-05-29 Thread Julien Lavergne
On Sun, 29 May 2011 00:24:57 +0100
Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 If we are going to keep pidgin for IM, what do we need xchat for?
It is on my TODO list for applications discussions. IMO, we should just drop 
xchat. I always use pidgin for IRC, and it doesn't a pretty decent work.

Regards,
Julien Lavergne

-- 
Julien Lavergne gi...@ubuntu.com

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] IRC Client

2011-05-29 Thread PCMan
+1 for dropping XChat.
The purpose of default applications are to provide a sane and
easy-to-use default for common users.
Learning how to use two different applications won't be easier than
learning one.
So using pidging for all protocols is supports do makes sense. Users
can learn once and use it for everything.
Power users who requires advanced scripting support can always install
their powerful favorites manually.
In the case of media player, gnome mplayer apparently has a bad music player UI.
That's why we need a separate music player. Otherwise mplayer works just fine.
For me, my favorite editor is geany, not leafpad.
However I won't ship a programmer's editor as a default text editor
for common users.
Having xchat specifically for irc instead of pidgin won't make that
much differences for common users, IMHO.
So only including pidgin might be better in this case.

On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Julien Lavergne gi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 On Sun, 29 May 2011 00:24:57 +0100
 Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 If we are going to keep pidgin for IM, what do we need xchat for?
 It is on my TODO list for applications discussions. IMO, we should just drop 
 xchat. I always use pidgin for IRC, and it doesn't a pretty decent work.

 Regards,
 Julien Lavergne

 --
 Julien Lavergne gi...@ubuntu.com

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 Post to     : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] IRC Client

2011-05-29 Thread Chris
I would be +1 on dropping xchat if it's IRC protocol would get a decent
upgrade, it's far to unstable in it's connection. Otherwise I would still
use it probably. Xchat's protocol for IRC is more solid (advantage of single
protocol apps).
I won't make a suggestion for default media player, as I like it to arrange
it for me, so I install Rhythmbox myself.
For default text editor I'd like to nominate gedit, as it is also
lightweight in my opinion, but has addition features compared to leafpad
(including, but not limited too syntax highlighting). I don't know how much
Empathy has progressed in the last few months and will in de coming, but
that might also be an good default for IM. Just a suggestion, but last time
I've used it I wasn't to keen on it. I didn't do a comparison between Pidgin
and Empathy in terms of stability and resources.

With metta,

Chris Druif

On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:13, PCMan pcman...@gmail.com wrote:

 +1 for dropping XChat.
 The purpose of default applications are to provide a sane and
 easy-to-use default for common users.
 Learning how to use two different applications won't be easier than
 learning one.
 So using pidging for all protocols is supports do makes sense. Users
 can learn once and use it for everything.
 Power users who requires advanced scripting support can always install
 their powerful favorites manually.
 In the case of media player, gnome mplayer apparently has a bad music
 player UI.
 That's why we need a separate music player. Otherwise mplayer works just
 fine.
 For me, my favorite editor is geany, not leafpad.
 However I won't ship a programmer's editor as a default text editor
 for common users.
 Having xchat specifically for irc instead of pidgin won't make that
 much differences for common users, IMHO.
 So only including pidgin might be better in this case.

 On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Julien Lavergne gi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
  On Sun, 29 May 2011 00:24:57 +0100
  Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 
  If we are going to keep pidgin for IM, what do we need xchat for?
  It is on my TODO list for applications discussions. IMO, we should just
 drop xchat. I always use pidgin for IRC, and it doesn't a pretty decent
 work.
 
  Regards,
  Julien Lavergne
 
  --
  Julien Lavergne gi...@ubuntu.com
 
  ___
  Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
  Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
  Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
  More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
 

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Lubuntu-desktop] IRC Client

2011-05-28 Thread Phill Whiteside
Hiyas,

todays lesson is to how to start a flame war

Whilst tidying up the 'new area' for docs I noticed a missing link. That was
the easy bit...

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Applications

If we are going to keep pidgin for IM, what do we need xchat for?

I ceased using xchat and reverted back to pidgin in 9.10 when x-chat had
that memory leak. It has been fixed, but pidgin does give a decent level of
IRC (I use it) along with the ability to do all the other IM protocols. It
also has 'plugin' package. Whilst not the 'best' IRC client, it does a
decent job of it and also provides access to all the IM stuff that people
seem to love these days Do we really want to waste RAM with two programmes?

/me retires to a safe distance.

@ Julien, I've pointed the list of applications from the community doc area
back to the dev area, as that page seems best placed there.

Regards,

Phill.

-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] IRC Client

2011-05-28 Thread Chris
Aloha ka po'e apau,

I've switched from using Pidgin to xchat, as the extra features are quite
nice and it seems more stable then Pidgin's implementation.

With metta,

Chris Druif

On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:24, Phill Whiteside phi...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Hiyas,

 todays lesson is to how to start a flame war

 Whilst tidying up the 'new area' for docs I noticed a missing link. That
 was the easy bit...

 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Applications

 If we are going to keep pidgin for IM, what do we need xchat for?

 I ceased using xchat and reverted back to pidgin in 9.10 when x-chat had
 that memory leak. It has been fixed, but pidgin does give a decent level of
 IRC (I use it) along with the ability to do all the other IM protocols. It
 also has 'plugin' package. Whilst not the 'best' IRC client, it does a
 decent job of it and also provides access to all the IM stuff that people
 seem to love these days Do we really want to waste RAM with two programmes?

 /me retires to a safe distance.

 @ Julien, I've pointed the list of applications from the community doc area
 back to the dev area, as that page seems best placed there.

 Regards,

 Phill.

 --
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] IRC Client

2011-05-28 Thread Jonathan Marsden
Phill,

On 05/28/2011 04:24 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:

 If we are going to keep pidgin for IM, what do we need xchat for?

Mainly for those of us who use IRC, and only IRC, and have used xchat
for years :)  It's a matter of personal preference, of course.

If there is good reason to remove xchat, I'll live (after all, I can
make custom ISOs based on Lubuntu fairly easily if I feel like it :)

 Do we really want to waste RAM with two programmes?

RAM?  Wait!  xchat does not load by default at boot.  How does it waste
RAM?  It is only using RAM when you choose to run it.

If wasting RAM is the issue, then removing xchat from the default
install will not solve it.  What led you to conclude that including
xchat is wasting RAM?

If we need more space on the CD for new whizzy stuff, OK, then we
probably need to go through the package list looking for things we can
remove.  What new whizzy stuff is being added in Lubuntu 11.10 that
requires extra disk/CD space?  I thought we had more or less reached
consensus among the devs that Lubuntu 11.10 was primarily a bug fix and
migrate to official build infrastructure and GTK3 release -- has that
changed?

Jonathan

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] IRC Client

2011-05-28 Thread Phill Whiteside
hiyas JM,

wasting RAm actually referred to having x-chat and pidgin both running
together... x-chat does IRC fanatastically, but is not too good at MSN
messenger, AOL / AIM, Yahoo! etc :)

regards,

Phill.

On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Jonathan Marsden jmars...@fastmail.fmwrote:

 Phill,

 On 05/28/2011 04:24 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:

  If we are going to keep pidgin for IM, what do we need xchat for?

 Mainly for those of us who use IRC, and only IRC, and have used xchat
 for years :)  It's a matter of personal preference, of course.

 If there is good reason to remove xchat, I'll live (after all, I can
 make custom ISOs based on Lubuntu fairly easily if I feel like it :)

  Do we really want to waste RAM with two programmes?

 RAM?  Wait!  xchat does not load by default at boot.  How does it waste
 RAM?  It is only using RAM when you choose to run it.

 If wasting RAM is the issue, then removing xchat from the default
 install will not solve it.  What led you to conclude that including
 xchat is wasting RAM?

 If we need more space on the CD for new whizzy stuff, OK, then we
 probably need to go through the package list looking for things we can
 remove.  What new whizzy stuff is being added in Lubuntu 11.10 that
 requires extra disk/CD space?  I thought we had more or less reached
 consensus among the devs that Lubuntu 11.10 was primarily a bug fix and
 migrate to official build infrastructure and GTK3 release -- has that
 changed?

 Jonathan

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] IRC Client

2011-05-28 Thread Jonathan Marsden
On 05/28/2011 05:34 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:

 wasting RAm actually referred to having x-chat and pidgin both running
 together... x-chat does IRC fanatastically, but is not too good at MSN
 messenger, AOL / AIM, Yahoo! etc :)

OK.  So the fix for that is simple: don't do that, unless you have
enough RAM to spare :)

No change to Lubuntu needed :)

Jonathan

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] IRC Client

2011-05-28 Thread Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset
IMHO having two programs that one fit in the other is a waste of space in
the CD and effort for the Lubuntu devs. Pidgin can handle what xchat does...
and for the specifics, xchat will always be installable.
Honestly, i personally (in person) don't know anybody that uses x-chat.

Just some thoughts.

2011/5/28 Jonathan Marsden jmars...@fastmail.fm

 On 05/28/2011 05:34 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:

  wasting RAm actually referred to having x-chat and pidgin both running
  together... x-chat does IRC fanatastically, but is not too good at MSN
  messenger, AOL / AIM, Yahoo! etc :)

 OK.  So the fix for that is simple: don't do that, unless you have
 enough RAM to spare :)

 No change to Lubuntu needed :)

 Jonathan

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




-- 
jpxsat
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] IRC Client

2011-05-28 Thread Jonathan Marsden
On 05/28/2011 06:47 PM, Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset wrote:

 IMHO having two programs that one fit in the other is a waste of
 space in the CD and effort for the Lubuntu devs.

It's definitely extra effort for one of the Lubuntu devs if I have to
learn to use Pidgin, after years of using xchat :)

Since xchat is not maintained by the Lubuntu devs, but by its own
developers, I am not sure why leaving it in the Lubuntu seed list is
*more* effort for the Lubuntu devs than taking it out -- can you please
explain?

 Pidgin can handle what xchat does...

Really?  Plugins for scripting in Tcl, Perl, Python all exist for Pidgin
now, do they?  Is the plugin API compatible with the xchat plugin API?
Or do we need to rewrite or find replacements for any and all plugins we
have written or gathered over the years?

I'll deal with it if someone feels there is a good reason for removing
xchat.  But IMO the expected developer cost to leave it alone is low :)

That leaves disk space.  In this thread, I already asked what we are
expecting to add to Lubuntu 11.10 Oneiric that *needs* the disk space
xchat currently occupies... has anyone answered that?

Jonathan

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp