And no, you're right, this is NOT a democracy. I mean, the audio player
has its own discussion (where everybody in this list voted their
suggestion). But there's one thing we cannot forget, the technical
details about RAM consumption, the space needed in the ISO, the license
of the included
Am Samstag 12 März 2011, um 18:31:14 schrieb 神癒礁湖 (Rafael Laguna):
And no, you're right, this is NOT a democracy. I mean, the audio player
has its own discussion (where everybody in this list voted their
suggestion). But there's one thing we cannot forget, the technical
details about RAM
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:23:27 +
Yorvyk yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:19:25 +0100
Julien Lavergne gi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Just a quick note, I'll *NOT* discuss again and again about the music
player. The choice was done for 11.04, and I don't attempt to
@Andres, he is not trying to be a jerk or anything but as with any type of
development there is a process. Once a application has been determined for a
OS than work begins to ensure full compatibility and bug fixes. If you try
and change up apps in the middle of development than you must start
2011/2/27 Yorvyk yorvik.ubu...@googlemail.com
Basically this would involve everybody using the same music to carry out
the measurements and also reporting the hardware used.
Couldn't be more agree with you: a standard test to make the decision would
be perfect to take a decision (and for
Le dimanche 27 février 2011 à 11:00 +, Yorvyk a écrit :
Which audio player to use must be about as controversial as which OS.
While I believe they should be 'heard and not seen', others require
them to run their computer.
Benchmarks alone are not going to find the best solution but can
6 matches
Mail list logo
