Hi,
thanks for the detailed reply. I'll remove the keyboard warning.
We can only use the Ubuntu building for futur ISO, not old. We (Jonathan
or me) can create a new 10.04, but it will need testing and maybe fixes.
I'm not sure it's so necessary, because you can do the install with the
current one, and do the updates as usual. I know it's long, but creating
and testing a new ISO will also need time.
I was thinking that possibly using something like remastersys
http://www.geekconnection.org/remastersys/ubuntu.html may be possible for
Jonathan to get a 'community' 10.04 update out pretty quickly rather than
you both having to spend time checking and re-checking a new-build?
As I write this I received your update on the alternate daily. I'll watch
out for it!
Regards,
Phill.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Julien Lavergne gi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Le Wednesday 27 July 2011 à 23:42 +0100, Phill Whiteside a écrit :
I *think* I have tracked down all pages referring to 'testing'. Could
you please check https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing for the
warning about Ubiquity and key-board etc.
The keyboard warning is not necessary anymore.
I have left the alpha 1 there as it is available at 'CD' size iso as
opposed to the usual too large daily images that we get during a
build.
I do think the page needs some further updating, so I ask if you could
possibly find a little time to ensure it is fully up to date.
Yes, but we will probably have some pages at http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/
Documentation will need update at this moment.
There was a mention of
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DerivativeTeam/Derivatives/Lubuntu that one of
the guys noticed, as I was previously unaware of a 'derivatives' team,
and it was well out of date I have put a divert on it to point to the
current page. As I have previously said, having various pages all
needing updating is madness. If their team has any complaints, please
forward them to me. I did leave a comment as to why I had done it.
I wasn't ware this Team was still active. I'm sure they will be ok with
the divert, thanks.
As we are now on 'official' build, where does this leave the earlier
builds, the one that spring to mind is 10.04 - Is it easier to
maintain these as not official builds using our 'old' system of
building, or can the 10.04 be brought into the 'official' build
system. 10.04 desperately needs re-making, there are something like
300 updates at 250Mb to download, if we are to truly to support it I
would strongly suggest that as the generic ubuntu is up to 10.04.3, we
do spin a new iso. I'm sure Jonathan will curse me every way, but I am
sure he can spin one for Lubuntu 10.04
We can only use the Ubuntu building for futur ISO, not old. We (Jonathan
or me) can create a new 10.04, but it will need testing and maybe fixes.
I'm not sure it's so necessary, because you can do the install with the
current one, and do the updates as usual. I know it's long, but creating
and testing a new ISO will also need time.
For 11.10, I note that 32bit and two 64bit variants are produced, but
there is no mention of an 'alternate' install iso. Is this something
that will be naturally added as Lubuntu slots into the 'official'
build system, or is it something that must be done separately?
I guess only 32 and 64 bits are available for daily build, and alternate
and armel (?) are produced only for releases (Alpha, Beta etc ..)
Regards,
Julien Lavergne
--
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
