Hey Paul, thanks for responding.
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 13:26:24 +0100, Paul Elschot wrote:
Tuning the scoring is difficult because one needs to avoid the trap
of optimizing for the test collection and test queries at hand. The
interplays between query structure, coord(), idf() and tf() add to
a good forum for IR, please share.
Otis
--- Kelvin Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't it be great if we can form a study-group of Lucene folks
who want to take the next step? I feel uneasy posting non-
Lucene specific questions to dev or user even if its related to
IR.
Feels to me like
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 22:10:26 -0800 (PST), Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Exactly. Luckily, since then I've learned a bit from lucene-dev
discussions and side IR readings, so some of the topics are making
more sense now.
Otis
--- Kelvin Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Otis, I was re-reading
Hi Otis, I was re-reading this whole theoretical thread about idf, scoring,
normalization, etc from last Oct and couldn't help laughing out loud when I
read your post, coz it summed up what I was thinking the whole time. I think
its really great to have people like Chuck and Paul (Eshlot)
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- luceneQueryConstructor.html17 May 2004 13:04:42 -1.3
+++ luceneQueryConstructor.html17 May 2004 13:29:24 -1.4
@@ -3,14 +3,16 @@
meta name=Author content=Kelvin Tan
titleLucene Query
think those two changes are okay. Please submit a patch. I imagine
you already made those two changes in your local copy of Lucene and
have actually been using it with your highlighting code?
Otis
--- Kelvin Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:02:25 -0700 (PDT), Otis
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:02:25 -0700 (PDT), Otis Gospodnetic said:
What do you think about a 1.3 release?
I think we should resolve the JavaCC situation and them make the 1.3
release. Perhaps it would be best to include JavaCC-generated .java
files in the CVS, as Doug described the other day.
Here's a pretty cool project at SF
http://sourceforge.net/projects/exteca
The Exteca platform is an ontology-based technology written in Java for
high-quality knowledge management and document categorisation. It can be used
in conjunction with search engines.
SF Project page says
I found this SF project doing a search for 'lucene' on SF.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/normalizer/
Excerpt says
Contextual rule-based text normalization engine written in java, that can be
used to implement stemming algorithms or phonetic normalizers. The project
includes a french
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:49:18 -0500, Armbrust, Daniel C. said:
Maybe you should add another page (or section on the page) that is
for people to list the names of their companies or products that are
using lucene (with a brief description of what for), as the current
page only shows that Lucene is
Bryan,
I've removed it from sandbox coz there never was a great deal of interest in
it, and the codebase from which I had originated it has moved on, so had no
wish to keep maintaining it.
Which aspect of Indyo interests you?
Kelvin
On Tue, 27 May 2003 22:36:39 -0500, Bryan LaPlante said:
: Kelvin Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lucene Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 10:56 PM
Subject: Re: Indyo
Bryan,
I've removed it from sandbox coz there never was a great deal of
interest in
it, and the codebase from which I had originated it has moved on, so
had no
wish
Maybe this is a good FAQ entry, under Searching?
http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg01735.html
Regards,
Kelvin
The book giving manifesto - http://how.to/sharethisbook
-
To unsubscribe,
PROTECTED]/msg01738.html
I haven't tested it...
Otis
--- Kelvin Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe this is a good FAQ entry, under Searching?
http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01735.html
Regards, Kelvin
The book giving manifesto - http://how.to/sharethisbook
Someone's got JDK 1.4 installed...:-)
compile:
[javac] Compiling 73 source files to
C:\checkout\jakarta-lucene\bin\classes
[javac]
C:\checkout\jakarta-lucene\src\java\org\apache\lucene\search\Query.jav
a:175: cannot resolve symbol
[javac] symbol : constructor RuntimeException
I couldn't help noticing that the code formatting for the new methods
are different from the rest of the class (Turbine vs Sun). Shouldn't
it be corrected?
On 7 Jan 2003 02:29:21 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
otis2003/01/06 18:29:21
Modified:src/java/org/apache/lucene/document
* just thought I'd point it out...
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:36:50 -0800 (PST), Otis Gospodnetic said:
Be my guest.
--- Kelvin Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I couldn't help noticing that the code formatting for the new
methods are different from the rest of the class (Turbine vs Sun).
Shouldn't
Please see attached for diff to benchmarks.xml for Daniel's numbers.
Thanks Dan!
Regards,
Kelvin
The book giving manifesto - http://how.to/sharethisbook
cvs -z9 diff benchmarks.xml (in directory C:\checkout\jakarta-lucene\xdocs\)
Index: benchmarks.xml
Please see attached for diff to benchmarks.xml for Daniel's numbers.
Thanks Dan!
Regards,
Kelvin
The book giving manifesto - http://how.to/sharethisbook
cvs -z9 diff benchmarks.xml (in directory C:\checkout\jakarta-lucene\xdocs\)
Index: benchmarks.xml
Dmitry would need commit access to the Lucene-sandbox to add the code in, I
believe...
Regards,
Kelvin
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:21:45 -0700, Peter Carlson wrote:
Into the sandbox area sound great.
Just add it to the contributions area in a project called
TermPositions
or something more clever if
Peter,
The index.xml file in Lucene xdocs should contain a link to it because I
modified it with:
subsection name=Indyo
p
Indyo is a datasource-independent Lucene indexing framework.
/p
p
A tutorial for using Indyo can be found a
href=indyo/tutorial.htmlhere/a.
/p
/subsection
It _should_ work,
[snip]
Having a framework for dealing with multiple file types (text, HTML,
PDF, Word, etc) is critical. There was a proposal that floated
around
a few months ago which should be dusted off.
Indyo, the indexing framework I checked into Sandbox (under the appex
project) handles this aspect of
there, and we could discuss refactorings to
introduce to make it implementation-neutral.
Regards,
Kelvin Tan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy,
I'm up for it. I've made further changes to what I previously posted and am
keen on getting it into sandbox.
K
- Original Message -
From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lucene Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: Proposal for
Great! Thanks for the support.
Regards,
Kelvin
- Original Message -
From: Peter Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lucene Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Kelvin Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lucene Sandbox committer nomination
That's
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lucene Sandbox committer nomination
I'm using his contribution, so +1, if he wants it, of course.
Otis
--- Peter Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am nominating Kelvin Tan as a contributor to the Lucene-Sandbox
Project
Copy and paste javadoc error in DateFilter. Really minor. Please see
attached.
Regards,
Kelvin Tan
Relevanz Pte Ltd
http://www.relevanz.com
180B Bencoolen St.
The Bencoolen, #04-01
S(189648)
Tel: 6238 6229
Fax: 6337 4417
cvs diff DateFilter.java (in directory
C:\checkout\jakarta-lucene
Torque DB index
that Reptile uses.
Sounds interesting doesn't it? :)
Regards,
Kelvin Tan
Relevanz Pte Ltd
http://www.relevanz.com
180B Bencoolen St.
The Bencoolen, #04-01
S(189648)
Tel: 238 6229
Fax: 337 4417
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
Mark,
My web server is acting all weird -- somehow this zip file refuses to
download completely via HTTP (both in IE and Netscape, but downloading via
FTP is fine).
The workaround is that I've renamed it to
http://www.relevanz.com/search_full.z. If your friendly zip program doesn't
recognize it
the equivalent of the commons-sandbox or turbine-stratum, a workplace
kind-of.
Regards,
Kelvin
Has anyone else looked at this? Any objections?
-Andy
On Sat, 2002-02-09 at 07:58, Kelvin Tan wrote:
Here it is. Released under APL (I kinda copied and pasted the license
from
some Fulcrum code). Some
]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: Proposal for Lucene
Is this open source? APL'd? Where can I look at it?
-Andy
On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 20:27, Kelvin Tan wrote:
Great suggestions all around, and I'm pretty much in agreement with
what's been said.
In my app, I've built
31 matches
Mail list logo
