Changing INDEX_INTERVAL to allow smaller memory footprint?

2005-02-14 Thread Kevin A. Burton
I started a thread about a week ago about the memory footprint of opening up a lucene index. Our 30G index takes about 980M of memory to open. Otis and some others suggested changing TermInfosWriter.INDEX_INTERVAL (or specifically a variable that is 128 by default). I grepped through the

Re: Changing INDEX_INTERVAL to allow smaller memory footprint?

2005-02-14 Thread Kevin A. Burton
Kevin A. Burton wrote: I started a thread about a week ago about the memory footprint of opening up a lucene index. Ug... you know I'm sorry. Doug responded to this but I didn't see his followup. I'll try this change this week and see what happens. You can increase