Re: [VOTE] Re: Incubating Lucene.Net

2005-02-17 Thread Doug Cutting
+1 Doug - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [VOTE] Re: Incubating Lucene.Net

2005-02-17 Thread George Aroush
Hi Erik, Regarding Garrett's concern, I responded to him regarding, so therefore isn't any issue. As for Lookout, Beagle, ets, I know for fact that Beagle, Ascirum and .Text are using dotLucene, I don't know about Lookout. Just do a Google them and you will see. As for the name of the project,

Re: [VOTE] Re: Incubating Lucene.Net

2005-02-17 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
+1 Otis --- Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lucene.Net has my +1. Other PMC members please cast your vote also. As for Garrett's concerns, it is my understanding that dotLucene is not based the previous Lucene.NET codebase. Though George mentions Lookout, Beagle, and some

RE: [VOTE] Re: Incubating Lucene.Net

2005-02-17 Thread Pasha Bizhan
Hi, From: George Aroush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] As for Lookout, Beagle, ets, I know for fact that Beagle, Ascirum and .Text are using dotLucene, I don't know about Lookout. Just do a Google them and you will see. Lookout use Lucene.Net 1.3.3.1. Pasha Bizhan

Re: [VOTE] Re: Incubating Lucene.Net

2005-02-17 Thread Scott Ganyo
+1 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature