On Dec 22, 2003, at 5:13 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Okay. I've incorporated all the changes that I intend to before the
release. I'll wait another day for folks to chime in with last minute
stuff. Also, I'd appreciate it if anyone tests the latest CVS for
obvious problems. Thanks.
I've run all
Hi,
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think we should create a section in the Sandbox just for
different types of Analyzers.
Yes!
Pasha Bizhan
http://sf.net/projects/lucenedotnet
-
To unsubscribe,
+1
I'm willing to include this patch in 1.3 final. Are there any who see
problems with it or otherwise oppose it?
Doug
John McNally wrote:
I'd certainly like to see a resolution to my sigram/cjk
question/proposal a few days ago. It might not be a high priority
issue, but I think if there is
Okay. I've incorporated all the changes that I intend to before the
release. I'll wait another day for folks to chime in with last minute
stuff. Also, I'd appreciate it if anyone tests the latest CVS for
obvious problems. Thanks.
Doug
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
++1!
Otis
--- Doug Cutting
+1 yeah!
On Friday, December 19, 2003, at 04:31 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
I'm thinking of making a 1.3 final release in the next few days.
Any objections?
Doug
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
I'd certainly like to see a resolution to my sigram/cjk
question/proposal a few days ago. It might not be a high priority
issue, but I think if there is agreement it is a simple fix.
I'm sure I'm discussing stuff that is well known in this community, but
will give some background just in case.
How about added CJK analyser in 1.3 final release?
Regards
Che, Dong
From: Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Lucene Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lucene Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: release 1.3-final in 2003?
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:04:19 -0500
+1 yeah
