Hi Anson,
It's not quite correct to comparing MG4J and Lucene directly. Lucene
is a toolkit whose primary goal is to let you create an index and
search it, while MG4J is really a library of Java classes that people
implementing an IR library (such as Lucene, for example) may find
useful. You can
elopers List
Subject: Re: mg4j - Managing Gigabyte for Java
Antonio Gulli wrote:
> Just a question: my personal experience with a commercial engine i
> partly developed is the the "continuation bit" (aka altavista solution)
> is a good and efficient solution w.r.t gamma code
Antonio Gulli wrote:
Just a question: my personal experience with a commercial engine i
partly developed is the the "continuation bit" (aka altavista solution)
is a good and efficient solution w.r.t gamma code, delta code and other
codes used for variable lenght int rappresentation (see MG).
G
David Spencer wrote:
Anson Lau wrote:
Hi All,
Has anyone seen the project MG4J (Managing Gigabyte for Java)
http://mg4j.dsi.unimi.it/ ? Anybody knows enough about both Lucene
and MG4J to comment on how the two compares?
I've wondered if Lucene does comparable (key/index) compression to
what the
Anson Lau wrote:
Hi All,
Has anyone seen the project MG4J (Managing Gigabyte for Java)
http://mg4j.dsi.unimi.it/ ? Anybody knows enough about both Lucene
and MG4J to comment on how the two compares?
I've wondered if Lucene does comparable (key/index) compression to what
the related book (Managing
