On Feb 4, 2005, at 4:59 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Also, we should package a lucene-XX-all.zip/.tar.gz that includes all
the contrib pieces also allowing someone to simply download Lucene
and all the packaged contrib pieces at once.
I'll go further: that should be the only downlo
On Feb 4, 2005, at 4:59 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Also, we should package a lucene-XX-all.zip/.tar.gz that includes all
the contrib pieces also allowing someone to simply download Lucene
and all the packaged contrib pieces at once.
I'll go further: that should be the only downlo
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Also, we should package a lucene-XX-all.zip/.tar.gz that includes all
the contrib pieces also allowing someone to simply download Lucene and
all the packaged contrib pieces at once.
I'll go further: that should be the only download. We should avoid
having a bunch of differen
Sounds good. 2. will force us to keep Sandbox pieces in sync with the
core.
Otis
--- Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, now that we've got the sandbox in the same source tree let's
> decide
> what we want to do with it. I have previously argued that we should
> make sure that sand
+1
I volunteer to tackle the initial restructuring (piecemeal over the
next few weeks), unless someone is more eager to hop on it.
Also, we should package a lucene-XX-all.zip/.tar.gz that includes all
the contrib pieces also allowing someone to simply download Lucene and
all the packaged contri
+1
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:47:46 -0800
Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>So, now that we've got the sandbox in the same source tree
>let's decide what we want to do with it. I have
>previously argued that we should make sure that sandbox
>code should be tagged and released in parallel with
