Hi,
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think we should create a section in the Sandbox just for
different types of Analyzers.
Yes!
Pasha Bizhan
http://sf.net/projects/lucenedotnet
-
To unsubscribe, e
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:35:07 +0100
Andrzej Bialecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like we should consider alternate names.
Suggestions??
ir.apache.org
retrieval.apache.org
textsearch.apache.org
searchengine.apache.org
Pasha Bizhan
Hi,
From: George Aroush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As for Lookout, Beagle, ets, I know for fact that Beagle,
Ascirum and .Text are using dotLucene, I don't know about
Lookout. Just do a Google them and you will see.
Lookout use Lucene.Net 1.3.3.1.
Pasha Bizhan
Hi,
From: Doug Cutting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only problem would be if someone else felt that the name
Lucene.Net was their property.
Read the license and look the source code.
Lucene.Net copyrighted to Apache Software Foundation.
Pasha Bizhan
http://lucenedotnet.com
