[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835068#action_12835068
]
Michael Garski commented on LUCENENET-328:
--
My 2 cents here... I'd like to see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835070#action_12835070
]
Michael Garski commented on LUCENENET-319:
--
Are we done with all of the above t
With today's commits, the Lucene.Net trunk is up to par with Java Lucene
2.9.2. If you have not already, please grab the latest from the trunk
and provide feedback on any issues that arise.
It's nearly time to get this as an official release and allow us to move
forward with 3.0. (or to main
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835057#action_12835057
]
Michael Garski commented on LUCENENET-340:
--
+1 for me on this patch, as TextRea
No worries! I committed one minor change to your patch where a helper method
in the TestMultiThreadTermVectors was marked with a [Test] attribute when it
should not have been.
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:36 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-336.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Shortcut for Lucene.NET 2.9.1 --> 2.9.2
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Garski resolved LUCENENET-339.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved with revision 911185
> FilterCleaner throws exception
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Garski closed LUCENENET-331.
Resolution: Fixed
This patch was included in LUCENENET-336
> CustomScoreQuery (function
Sorry Michael,
I may have ported those changes, but I am not sure. Since I took all changed
files in Lucene-Java and ported to .NET without thinking on issues created
before.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgar...@myspace-inc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 201
It looks like your patch included the LUCENENET-331 custom score query fix - I
went to apply it to my local copy of the trunk and all the changes were already
applied :)
I'll commit the FilterCleaner patch after going through the complete unit tests
against the latest in the trunk.
Michael
--
> Does youre recent commit include the fix for custom score queries
(LUCENENET-331) and the fix for the FilterCleaner (LUCENENET-339)?
No, it is just "trunk-->2.9.2".
> If not, I can commit those as well to bring us up to a complete 2.9.2 code
base.
OK. Now it's your turn.
DIGY
-Original Me
Digy -
Does youre recent commit include the fix for custom score queries
(LUCENENET-331) and the fix for the FilterCleaner (LUCENENET-339)?
If not, I can commit those as well to bring us up to a complete 2.9.2
code base.
Michael
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12834954#action_12834954
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-336:
Patch applied. Lucene.NET 2.9.2 is in trunk now ( and i
Hi Michael,
I don't think that there is a convention about the packaging or structure of
contrib.
For the ports, a java-like directory hierarchy can be used (like
Contrib\Queries\Search\src & Contrib\Queries\Search\test for BooleanFilter &
TermFilter)
For others, something like
Contrib/Search/Se
14 matches
Mail list logo
