RE: [Lucene.Net] svn commit: r1100639 - /incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_9_4g/src/core/Support/EquatableList.cs

2011-05-07 Thread Digy
Hi Prescott, Can you apply these fixes also to trunk? They don't diverge from java 2.9.4 and can be compiled targetting .NET 2.0. LUCENENET-361 Workaround for a Mono C# compiler issue LUCENENET-330 Search.Regex Minimal Port LUCENENET-371 Unit test for Search.Regex port DIGY -Original Messa

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Resolved] (LUCENENET-330) Search.Regex minimal port

2011-05-07 Thread Prescott Nasser (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-330. --- Resolution: Fixed In Lucene.Net_2_9_4g > Search.Regex minimal port >

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Resolved] (LUCENENET-371) Unit test for Search.Regex port

2011-05-07 Thread Prescott Nasser (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-371. --- Resolution: Fixed In Branch Lucene.Net_2_9_4g > Unit test for Search.Regex port >

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Resolved] (LUCENENET-266) Putting support classes in separate files and in a separate directory

2011-05-07 Thread Prescott Nasser (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-266. --- Resolution: Fixed In Branch Lucene.Net_2_9_4g > Putting support classes in separ

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Resolved] (LUCENENET-377) Upgrade solution to VS2010

2011-05-07 Thread Prescott Nasser (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prescott Nasser resolved LUCENENET-377. --- Resolution: Fixed In Branch LuceneNet_2_9_4g > Upgrade solution to VS2010 > -

Re: [Lucene.Net] separating project file from actual code files

2011-05-07 Thread Troy Howard
Are you working with VS2010 Express? Or one of the full versions? If you're using Express, unfortunately, it's default settings are a bit confusing. In the create new project dialog, the 'normal' field for project directory is not displayed, only one for name. To enable this, you need to go to 'To

RE: [Lucene.Net] separating project file from actual code files

2011-05-07 Thread Prescott Nasser
most helpful, thanks! > Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 15:27:37 -0400 > From: wyatt.barn...@gmail.com > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] separating project file from actual code files > > Never worked in this kind of layout befor

Re: [Lucene.Net] separating project file from actual code files

2011-05-07 Thread Wyatt Barnett
Never worked in this kind of layout before, but I've moved things on solutions so this should work: 1) Create the project where you want it, with the solution file there. 2) Save and close visual studio. 3) Move the solution file over to where appropriate. 4) Open solution in text editor of your c

[Lucene.Net] separating project file from actual code files

2011-05-07 Thread Prescott Nasser
This seems like it should be obvious, but I'm trying to create a new Contrib.Regex project for the Regex stuff. However, when I do this, VS wants to put all the .cs files into the build directory where the project file is. How do I tell the project file that the actual files for the project sh

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-330) Search.Regex minimal port

2011-05-07 Thread Prescott Nasser (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030382#comment-13030382 ] Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-330: --- whoops - I'll make the change sh

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Resolved] (LUCENENET-413) Medium trust security issue

2011-05-07 Thread Digy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Digy resolved LUCENENET-413. Resolution: Fixed fixed in trunk & 2.9.4g branch. > Medium trust security issue > ---

RE: [Lucene.Net] var

2011-05-07 Thread Digy
The new C# features are committed only to 2.9.4g branch. 2.9.4 can still be built targeting .NET 2.0. We can continue to support both version in parallel (in terms of bug fixes such as LUCENENET-172 & LUCENENET-413, maybe LUCENENET-266) and declare that 2.9.4 will be the last version supporting

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-330) Search.Regex minimal port

2011-05-07 Thread Digy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030358#comment-13030358 ] Digy commented on LUCENENET-330: Hi Prescott, I think the correct place for Regex is co

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-266) Putting support classes in separate files and in a separate directory

2011-05-07 Thread Digy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13030356#comment-13030356 ] Digy commented on LUCENENET-266: Hi Prescott, Thank you for refactoring the SupportClas

RE: [Lucene.Net] var

2011-05-07 Thread Digy
A good blog about this. http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2011/04/20/uses-and-misuses-of-i mplicit-typing.aspx DIGY -Original Message- From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com] Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 8:20 AM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [Lucene

Re: [Lucene.Net] var

2011-05-07 Thread Wyatt Barnett
I fully agree on moving past 2.0 for development and using MSBuild 4.0. I think maintaing 2.0/3.5 binary support is worth the effort, at least for the 2.x branch or at least worth keeping in mind. Lots of stuff hasn't bitten the 4.0 bullet yet whereas 2.0 and I think 3.5 are included in windows.

Re: [Lucene.Net] var

2011-05-07 Thread Troy Howard
Using var is wonderful and great. We'll hopefully do doing a lot of refactoring in the near future. var makes refactoring easier. I think we've committed fairly strongly to moving past 2.0 support. AFAIK the current trunk won't build under 2.0 anyhow (or am I mistaken, DIGY used HashSet in a recen

RE: [Lucene.Net] var

2011-05-07 Thread Aaron Powell
Yes it's a C# 3 feature, but the C# 3 compiler (shipped in VS 2008) can compile C# 2.0 and C# 3.0 assemblies. Quick test: http://www.aaron-powell.com/get/var-csharp-2.PNG I don't have VS 2008 though, this test was done with VS 2010 using the multitargetting features Aaron Powell MVP - Internet

RE: [Lucene.Net] var

2011-05-07 Thread Prescott Nasser
~Prescott Nasser prescott.nas...@hotmail.com 650.208.4205 It's a 3.0 keyword, can't be used pre C# 3.0 > From: m...@aaron-powell.com > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 07:28:36 + > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] var > > My understanding of the 'var' keyword is jus

RE: [Lucene.Net] var

2011-05-07 Thread Aaron Powell
My understanding of the 'var' keyword is just C# syntactic sugar, which the compiler will translate into the actual CLR type for variable assignment, so the compiler is capable of compiling CLR 2.0 assemblies anyway. Aaron Powell MVP - Internet Explorer (Development) | Umbraco Core Team MemberĀ |