One of the benefits of moving forward with the conversion of the Java
Lucene, is that they're using more recent versions of Java that support
things like generics and enums, so the direct port is getting more and more
like .NET, though not in all respects of course. I'm of the mind, though,
that
I'm not that proficient in JIRA yet, and can only find 22 open issues
outstanding. Is this correct, or am I missing something?
-r
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
You can look at the jira issues for Java lucene 3.0.3 and submit patches
for 2.9.4g
but I guess the future of 2.9.4g depends on the extent that it is becoming
more .NET like
My intention while I was creating that branch was just to make 2.9.4 a
little bit more .Net like(+ maybe some performance).
I used many codes from 3.0.3 Java. So it is somewhere between 2.9.4 3.0.3
But I
That's 40 issues that the Java Lucene team tagged as needed for 3.0.3 release
(so they are all closed atm) I will try to port many/most of these over this
week into our JIRA so we can track them for ourselves.
From: geobmx...@hotmail.com To:
Any reason we can't continue this g branch and make it more and more .net like?
I was thinking about what we've expressed at goals - we want a line by line
port - it's easy to maintain parity with java and easy to compare. We also want
a more .NET version - the g branch gets this started -
